道路工程设计阶段的不确定性处理

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Rouzbeh Shabani, T. O. Malvik, Agnar Johansen, Olav Torp
{"title":"道路工程设计阶段的不确定性处理","authors":"Rouzbeh Shabani, T. O. Malvik, Agnar Johansen, Olav Torp","doi":"10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeUncertainty management (UM) in projects has been a point of attention for researchers for many years. Research on UM has mainly been aimed at uncertainty analyses in the front-end and managing uncertainty in the construction phase. In contrast, UM components in the design phase have received less attention. This research aims to improve knowledge about the key components of UM in the design phase of large road projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a literature review and case study. The literature review was used to identify relevant criteria for UM. These criteria helped to design the interview guide. Multiple case study research was conducted, and data were collected through document study and interviews with project stakeholders in two road projects. Each case's owners, contractors and consultants were interviewed individually.FindingsThe data analysis obtained helpful information on the involved parties, process and exploit tools and techniques during the design phase. Johansen's (2015) framework [(a) human and organisation, (b) process and (c) tools and techniques)] was completed and developed by identifying relevant criteria (such as risk averse or risk-taker, culture and documentation level) for each component. These criteria help to measure UM performance. The authors found that owners and contractors are major formal UM actors, not consultants. Empirical data showed the effectiveness of Web-based tools in UM.Research limitations/implicationsThe studied cases were Norwegian, and this study focussed on uncertainties in the project's design phase. Relevant criteria did not cover all the criteria for evaluating the performance of UM. Qualitative evaluation of criteria allows further quantitative analysis in the future.Practical implicationsThis paper gave project owners and managers a better understanding of relevant criteria for measuring UM in the owners and managers' projects. The paper provides policy-makers with a deeper understanding of creating rigorous project criteria for UM during the design phase. This paper also provides a guideline for UM in road projects.Originality/valueThis research gives a holistic evaluation of UM by noticing relevant criteria and criteria's interconnection in the design phase.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dealing with uncertainties in the design phase of road projects\",\"authors\":\"Rouzbeh Shabani, T. O. Malvik, Agnar Johansen, Olav Torp\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeUncertainty management (UM) in projects has been a point of attention for researchers for many years. Research on UM has mainly been aimed at uncertainty analyses in the front-end and managing uncertainty in the construction phase. In contrast, UM components in the design phase have received less attention. This research aims to improve knowledge about the key components of UM in the design phase of large road projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a literature review and case study. The literature review was used to identify relevant criteria for UM. These criteria helped to design the interview guide. Multiple case study research was conducted, and data were collected through document study and interviews with project stakeholders in two road projects. Each case's owners, contractors and consultants were interviewed individually.FindingsThe data analysis obtained helpful information on the involved parties, process and exploit tools and techniques during the design phase. Johansen's (2015) framework [(a) human and organisation, (b) process and (c) tools and techniques)] was completed and developed by identifying relevant criteria (such as risk averse or risk-taker, culture and documentation level) for each component. These criteria help to measure UM performance. The authors found that owners and contractors are major formal UM actors, not consultants. Empirical data showed the effectiveness of Web-based tools in UM.Research limitations/implicationsThe studied cases were Norwegian, and this study focussed on uncertainties in the project's design phase. Relevant criteria did not cover all the criteria for evaluating the performance of UM. Qualitative evaluation of criteria allows further quantitative analysis in the future.Practical implicationsThis paper gave project owners and managers a better understanding of relevant criteria for measuring UM in the owners and managers' projects. The paper provides policy-makers with a deeper understanding of creating rigorous project criteria for UM during the design phase. This paper also provides a guideline for UM in road projects.Originality/valueThis research gives a holistic evaluation of UM by noticing relevant criteria and criteria's interconnection in the design phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

项目中的不确定性管理(UM)多年来一直是研究人员关注的问题。对集成管理的研究主要针对前端的不确定性分析和构建阶段的不确定性管理。相比之下,设计阶段的UM组件受到的关注较少。本研究旨在提高对大型道路项目设计阶段UM关键组成部分的认识。设计/方法/方法本研究采用文献综述和个案研究相结合的方法。文献回顾用于确定UM的相关标准。这些标准有助于设计面试指南。在两个道路项目中进行了多案例研究,并通过文献研究和项目利益相关者访谈收集数据。每个案例的业主、承包商和顾问都被单独采访。数据分析在设计阶段获得了有关相关方、过程和开发工具和技术的有用信息。Johansen(2015)框架[(a)人员和组织,(b)流程和(c)工具和技术]通过确定每个组件的相关标准(如风险厌恶者或风险承担者,文化和文档水平)来完成和发展。这些标准有助于衡量UM的性能。作者发现,业主和承包商是UM的主要正式参与者,而不是顾问。实证数据显示了基于web的工具在UM中的有效性。研究的局限性/意义研究的案例是挪威的,本研究侧重于项目设计阶段的不确定性。有关标准并没有涵盖评估UM表现的所有标准。标准的定性评价允许将来进一步的定量分析。实际意义本文让项目业主和经理对业主和经理的项目中衡量价值的相关标准有了更好的了解。本文为政策制定者提供了在设计阶段为UM创建严格的项目标准的更深入的理解。本文还为道路工程中umm的应用提供了指导。原创性/价值本研究通过注意设计阶段的相关标准和标准的相互联系,对UM进行了全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dealing with uncertainties in the design phase of road projects
PurposeUncertainty management (UM) in projects has been a point of attention for researchers for many years. Research on UM has mainly been aimed at uncertainty analyses in the front-end and managing uncertainty in the construction phase. In contrast, UM components in the design phase have received less attention. This research aims to improve knowledge about the key components of UM in the design phase of large road projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a literature review and case study. The literature review was used to identify relevant criteria for UM. These criteria helped to design the interview guide. Multiple case study research was conducted, and data were collected through document study and interviews with project stakeholders in two road projects. Each case's owners, contractors and consultants were interviewed individually.FindingsThe data analysis obtained helpful information on the involved parties, process and exploit tools and techniques during the design phase. Johansen's (2015) framework [(a) human and organisation, (b) process and (c) tools and techniques)] was completed and developed by identifying relevant criteria (such as risk averse or risk-taker, culture and documentation level) for each component. These criteria help to measure UM performance. The authors found that owners and contractors are major formal UM actors, not consultants. Empirical data showed the effectiveness of Web-based tools in UM.Research limitations/implicationsThe studied cases were Norwegian, and this study focussed on uncertainties in the project's design phase. Relevant criteria did not cover all the criteria for evaluating the performance of UM. Qualitative evaluation of criteria allows further quantitative analysis in the future.Practical implicationsThis paper gave project owners and managers a better understanding of relevant criteria for measuring UM in the owners and managers' projects. The paper provides policy-makers with a deeper understanding of creating rigorous project criteria for UM during the design phase. This paper also provides a guideline for UM in road projects.Originality/valueThis research gives a holistic evaluation of UM by noticing relevant criteria and criteria's interconnection in the design phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信