{"title":"Praetorius vs Zarlino:模式问题","authors":"Nejc Sukljan","doi":"10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the question of modes as it is discussed in Gioseffo Zarlino’s Istitutioni harmoniche and Michael Praetorius’s Syntagma musicum. First, Gioseffo Zarlino’s adoption of Heinrich Glarean’s system of twelve modes is presented, along with the changes he introduced. Gioseffo Zarlino’s system is then compared to that of Michael Praetorius.","PeriodicalId":38033,"journal":{"name":"De Musica Disserenda","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Praetorius Versus Zarlino: The Question of Modes\",\"authors\":\"Nejc Sukljan\",\"doi\":\"10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the question of modes as it is discussed in Gioseffo Zarlino’s Istitutioni harmoniche and Michael Praetorius’s Syntagma musicum. First, Gioseffo Zarlino’s adoption of Heinrich Glarean’s system of twelve modes is presented, along with the changes he introduced. Gioseffo Zarlino’s system is then compared to that of Michael Praetorius.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Musica Disserenda\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Musica Disserenda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Musica Disserenda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article deals with the question of modes as it is discussed in Gioseffo Zarlino’s Istitutioni harmoniche and Michael Praetorius’s Syntagma musicum. First, Gioseffo Zarlino’s adoption of Heinrich Glarean’s system of twelve modes is presented, along with the changes he introduced. Gioseffo Zarlino’s system is then compared to that of Michael Praetorius.
期刊介绍:
De musica disserenda is an international journal of musical scholarship. It is published by the Institute of Musicology ZRC SAZU (Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts) at the ZRC Publishing (Založba ZRC). The journal is publishing musicological as well as interdisciplinary articles regarding music, with a special attention given to the texts on history of music on the territory of today’s Slovenia in wider European context. Individual issues of the journal with various dissertations are published twice a year, while thematic double issues are published at the end an individual year. The articles are published in Slovenian, English, German, French or Italian languages, with keywords and abstracts in English and Slovenian. A longer summary in Slovenian or English is given at the end of each article.