工程布鲁塞尔挂毯:特权制度的发展、使用和影响,1600-1700年

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Brosens
{"title":"工程布鲁塞尔挂毯:特权制度的发展、使用和影响,1600-1700年","authors":"K. Brosens","doi":"10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By conceptualising and analysing the privileges awarded to Brussels tapestry actors in the seventeenth century as serial data, and thus as a — consistently inconsistent — system, and by combining quantitative and qualitative readings of the data, this essay refines our understanding of the mechanics of Brussels baroque tapestry. One of the most salient insights is the marginal position of painters within the privilege system, showing that producers — and therefore patrons — identified ‘Brussels tapestry’ with quality of materials and weft rather than with a specific pictorial style. Ensuring quality, however, was complex, as it was dependent on the varying agendas of different stakeholders. The essay shows how they constantly adapted the privilege system to navigate and mitigate not only these issues, but also contextual factors that impacted the Brussels art worlds. Thus, the essay can also serve as a backdrop against which future studies of Brussels baroque art can be placed.","PeriodicalId":43311,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering Brussels Tapestry: Development, Uses and Effects of the Privilege System, 1600–1700\",\"authors\":\"K. Brosens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By conceptualising and analysing the privileges awarded to Brussels tapestry actors in the seventeenth century as serial data, and thus as a — consistently inconsistent — system, and by combining quantitative and qualitative readings of the data, this essay refines our understanding of the mechanics of Brussels baroque tapestry. One of the most salient insights is the marginal position of painters within the privilege system, showing that producers — and therefore patrons — identified ‘Brussels tapestry’ with quality of materials and weft rather than with a specific pictorial style. Ensuring quality, however, was complex, as it was dependent on the varying agendas of different stakeholders. The essay shows how they constantly adapted the privilege system to navigate and mitigate not only these issues, but also contextual factors that impacted the Brussels art worlds. Thus, the essay can also serve as a backdrop against which future studies of Brussels baroque art can be placed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTILE HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过将17世纪授予布鲁塞尔挂毯演员的特权概念化和分析为串行数据,从而作为一个一贯不一致的系统,并结合对数据的定量和定性解读,本文加深了我们对布鲁塞尔巴洛克挂毯力学的理解。最突出的见解之一是画家在特权制度中的边缘地位,这表明生产者——因此也是赞助人——用材料和纬纱的质量而不是特定的绘画风格来识别“布鲁塞尔挂毯”。然而,确保质量是复杂的,因为它取决于不同利益攸关方的不同议程。这篇文章展示了他们如何不断调整特权制度,以应对和缓解这些问题,以及影响布鲁塞尔艺术界的背景因素。因此,这篇文章也可以作为未来研究布鲁塞尔巴洛克艺术的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering Brussels Tapestry: Development, Uses and Effects of the Privilege System, 1600–1700
By conceptualising and analysing the privileges awarded to Brussels tapestry actors in the seventeenth century as serial data, and thus as a — consistently inconsistent — system, and by combining quantitative and qualitative readings of the data, this essay refines our understanding of the mechanics of Brussels baroque tapestry. One of the most salient insights is the marginal position of painters within the privilege system, showing that producers — and therefore patrons — identified ‘Brussels tapestry’ with quality of materials and weft rather than with a specific pictorial style. Ensuring quality, however, was complex, as it was dependent on the varying agendas of different stakeholders. The essay shows how they constantly adapted the privilege system to navigate and mitigate not only these issues, but also contextual factors that impacted the Brussels art worlds. Thus, the essay can also serve as a backdrop against which future studies of Brussels baroque art can be placed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTILE HISTORY
TEXTILE HISTORY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Textile History is an internationally recognised, peer reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published in the spring and autumn of each year, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of scholarship arising from the history of textiles and dress. Since its foundation the scope of the journal has been substantially expanded to include articles dealing with aspects of the cultural and social history of apparel and textiles, as well as issues arising from the exhibition, preservation and interpretation of historic textiles or clothing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信