劳工动乱和工作的未来:全球反对外卖平台的斗争

Q2 Arts and Humanities
M. Stuart, Vera Trappmann, Ioulia Bessa, Simon Joyce, Denis Neumann, Charles Umney
{"title":"劳工动乱和工作的未来:全球反对外卖平台的斗争","authors":"M. Stuart, Vera Trappmann, Ioulia Bessa, Simon Joyce, Denis Neumann, Charles Umney","doi":"10.1177/0160449X231178780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor struggle and workers ’ collective agency are central concerns of labor studies researchers. Such an appreciation seems particularly apposite given contemporary debates around the future of work. As Schulze-Cleven and Vachon (2021) note, much future of work debate has been inscribed by technological and market fundamen-talism. The actions and experiences of workers are often absent from a narrative that instead tends to focus on predicting the extent of technology-driven job destruction or state policies that help workers navigate a future of profound industrial transformation. Against this, Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s edited volume stands as an important corrective, offering an analytical approach that revalues labor within a human-centered future of work that extends beyond a purely technological focus to also incorporate environmental change and social reproduction. This symposium contribution builds on Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s analytical approach to focus on labor struggles inter-nationally in the platform economy. For Schulze-Cleven (2021), core features of a labor studies approach include putting the experiences of working people and how they look to defend and advance their interests through collective action at the center of analysis. While platform work still accounts for a small proportion of total employment, platforms are often seen to be key drivers of capitalist restructuring predicated on more insecure and precarious jobs. Platform work is typically characterized by dubious forms of self-employment, set against historical ideals of a standard employment contract, whereby tasks are","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"287 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labor Unrest and the Future of Work: Global Struggles Against Food Delivery Platforms\",\"authors\":\"M. Stuart, Vera Trappmann, Ioulia Bessa, Simon Joyce, Denis Neumann, Charles Umney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160449X231178780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Labor struggle and workers ’ collective agency are central concerns of labor studies researchers. Such an appreciation seems particularly apposite given contemporary debates around the future of work. As Schulze-Cleven and Vachon (2021) note, much future of work debate has been inscribed by technological and market fundamen-talism. The actions and experiences of workers are often absent from a narrative that instead tends to focus on predicting the extent of technology-driven job destruction or state policies that help workers navigate a future of profound industrial transformation. Against this, Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s edited volume stands as an important corrective, offering an analytical approach that revalues labor within a human-centered future of work that extends beyond a purely technological focus to also incorporate environmental change and social reproduction. This symposium contribution builds on Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s analytical approach to focus on labor struggles inter-nationally in the platform economy. For Schulze-Cleven (2021), core features of a labor studies approach include putting the experiences of working people and how they look to defend and advance their interests through collective action at the center of analysis. While platform work still accounts for a small proportion of total employment, platforms are often seen to be key drivers of capitalist restructuring predicated on more insecure and precarious jobs. Platform work is typically characterized by dubious forms of self-employment, set against historical ideals of a standard employment contract, whereby tasks are\",\"PeriodicalId\":35267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"287 - 297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X231178780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X231178780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

劳动斗争和工人的集体能动性是劳动研究者关注的焦点。考虑到当代围绕作品未来的争论,这种赞赏似乎特别恰当。正如Schulze Cleven和Vachon(2021)所指出的,许多关于未来工作的辩论都被技术和市场基金主义所铭记。工人的行动和经历往往没有出现在叙事中,而是倾向于预测技术驱动的工作破坏的程度,或帮助工人驾驭深刻工业转型的未来的国家政策。与此相反,Schulze–Cleven和Vachon编辑的这本书是一个重要的纠正,它提供了一种分析方法,在以人为中心的未来工作中重新评估劳动力,这种方法超越了纯粹的技术关注,还将环境变化和社会再生产纳入其中。本次研讨会的贡献建立在Schulze–Cleven和Vachon的分析方法的基础上,该方法专注于平台经济中的跨国劳工斗争。Schulze Cleven(2021)认为,劳工研究方法的核心特征包括将劳动人民的经历以及他们如何通过集体行动捍卫和促进自己的利益置于分析的中心。尽管平台工作仍占总就业人数的一小部分,但平台往往被视为资本主义重组的关键驱动力,而资本主义重组的基础是更不安全和不稳定的工作。平台工作的特点通常是可疑的自营职业形式,与标准雇佣合同的历史理想背道而驰,根据标准雇佣合同,任务是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labor Unrest and the Future of Work: Global Struggles Against Food Delivery Platforms
Labor struggle and workers ’ collective agency are central concerns of labor studies researchers. Such an appreciation seems particularly apposite given contemporary debates around the future of work. As Schulze-Cleven and Vachon (2021) note, much future of work debate has been inscribed by technological and market fundamen-talism. The actions and experiences of workers are often absent from a narrative that instead tends to focus on predicting the extent of technology-driven job destruction or state policies that help workers navigate a future of profound industrial transformation. Against this, Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s edited volume stands as an important corrective, offering an analytical approach that revalues labor within a human-centered future of work that extends beyond a purely technological focus to also incorporate environmental change and social reproduction. This symposium contribution builds on Schulze – Cleven and Vachon ’ s analytical approach to focus on labor struggles inter-nationally in the platform economy. For Schulze-Cleven (2021), core features of a labor studies approach include putting the experiences of working people and how they look to defend and advance their interests through collective action at the center of analysis. While platform work still accounts for a small proportion of total employment, platforms are often seen to be key drivers of capitalist restructuring predicated on more insecure and precarious jobs. Platform work is typically characterized by dubious forms of self-employment, set against historical ideals of a standard employment contract, whereby tasks are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信