非刑事化之外:从相对透明到故意模糊的转变

IF 1.5 Q1 LAW
Golan Luzon
{"title":"非刑事化之外:从相对透明到故意模糊的转变","authors":"Golan Luzon","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond decriminalization: the transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"Golan Luzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1696082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了非刑事化现象。尽管没有关于非刑事化的全面定义,但常见的描述将其简化为某一行为不再值得刑事化的情况。本文认为,非刑事化是一种广泛的现象,在刑法的各个地方都可以找到,应该从相对透明向故意模糊过渡的法律角度来审视。为此,我分析了几种法律方法:纯粹的非刑事化、事实上的非犯罪化、去优先化、替代、重新分类和伪装的非刑事主义类型(恢复性司法和辩诉交易)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond decriminalization: the transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity
ABSTRACT This article explores the phenomenon of decriminalisation. Although there is no comprehensive definition of decriminaliszation, common descriptions reduce it to cases in which a certain conduct no longer deserves to be criminalised. This article argues that decriminalisation is a broad phenomenon, which can be found in various places in criminal law, and should be examined from the perspective of the law in transition from relative transparency to deliberate ambiguity. To this end, I analyze several legal approaches: pure decriminalisation, de facto decriminalisation, de-prioritization, substitution, reclassification, and types of camouflaged decriminalisation (restorative justice and plea bargaining).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信