{"title":"1%特比萘芬乳膏与1%丁那芬乳膏治疗股癣的比较研究","authors":"Meher Afsun, Iftekhar Ahmed","doi":"10.3329/jemc.v11i1.63172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tinea cruris constitutes a major health problem worldwide. Although not lifethreatening, it can cause significant discomfort in daily activities. So, search for better therapeutic options in terms of clinical efficacy and safety profile is ongoing.\nObjective: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine 1% and butenafine 1% cream in the treatment of tinea cruris.\nMaterials and Methods: This Comparative interventional study was carried out in the Dermatology & Venereology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University between October 2014 and March 2015. A total of 50 patients of tinea cruris who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent were enrolled in the study. They were then divided into two groups as Group A (terbinafine group) and Group B (butenafine group) in a 1:1 ratio following a simple randomization method. Patients were advised to apply the medication once daily for 2 weeks and evaluated on the basis of clinical assessment score at the end of 1 and 2 weeks.\nResults: The baseline socio-demographic characteristics of the two groups were not statistically significantly different. Higher clinical cure was observed in butenafine recipients as compared with terbinafine recipients on the basis of mean clinical assessment score at the end of 7 days (5.72±0.7 vs 4.12±0.7) and 14 days (3.04±0.5 vs 1.44±0.9). The difference was statistically significant at both the time points. Both the drugs were well-tolerated except one patient of terbinafine group complained of transient burning.\nConclusion: Treatment with butenafine 1% cream can be considered superior to terbinafine 1% cream in case of tinea cruris.\nJ Enam Med Col 2021; 11(1): 39-46","PeriodicalId":30472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enam Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Topical Terbinafine 1% Cream versus Butenafine 1% Cream in the Treatment of Tinea Cruris\",\"authors\":\"Meher Afsun, Iftekhar Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jemc.v11i1.63172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tinea cruris constitutes a major health problem worldwide. Although not lifethreatening, it can cause significant discomfort in daily activities. So, search for better therapeutic options in terms of clinical efficacy and safety profile is ongoing.\\nObjective: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine 1% and butenafine 1% cream in the treatment of tinea cruris.\\nMaterials and Methods: This Comparative interventional study was carried out in the Dermatology & Venereology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University between October 2014 and March 2015. A total of 50 patients of tinea cruris who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent were enrolled in the study. They were then divided into two groups as Group A (terbinafine group) and Group B (butenafine group) in a 1:1 ratio following a simple randomization method. Patients were advised to apply the medication once daily for 2 weeks and evaluated on the basis of clinical assessment score at the end of 1 and 2 weeks.\\nResults: The baseline socio-demographic characteristics of the two groups were not statistically significantly different. Higher clinical cure was observed in butenafine recipients as compared with terbinafine recipients on the basis of mean clinical assessment score at the end of 7 days (5.72±0.7 vs 4.12±0.7) and 14 days (3.04±0.5 vs 1.44±0.9). The difference was statistically significant at both the time points. Both the drugs were well-tolerated except one patient of terbinafine group complained of transient burning.\\nConclusion: Treatment with butenafine 1% cream can be considered superior to terbinafine 1% cream in case of tinea cruris.\\nJ Enam Med Col 2021; 11(1): 39-46\",\"PeriodicalId\":30472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Enam Medical College\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Enam Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v11i1.63172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enam Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v11i1.63172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:股癣是世界范围内的一个主要健康问题。虽然没有生命危险,但在日常活动中会引起严重的不适。因此,在临床疗效和安全性方面寻找更好的治疗方案正在进行中。目的:比较1%特比萘芬乳膏和1%布替萘芬乳膏治疗股癣的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:这项比较介入研究于2014年10月至2015年3月在Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学皮肤性病科进行。共有50名符合纳入标准并获得同意的股癣患者参与了这项研究。然后按照简单的随机化方法,将他们按1:1的比例分为A组(特比萘芬组)和B组(布替萘芬组)。建议患者每天用药一次,持续2周,并在1周和2周结束时根据临床评估得分进行评估。结果:两组的基线社会人口学特征在统计学上没有显著差异。根据7天(5.72±0.7 vs 4.12±0.7)和14天(3.04±0.5 vs 1.44±0.9)的平均临床评估得分,与特比萘芬受体相比,布替萘芬受体的临床治愈率更高。这两个时间点的差异具有统计学意义。除了特比萘芬组的一名患者抱怨短暂烧伤外,这两种药物的耐受性都很好。结论:1%布替萘芬乳膏治疗股癣疗效优于1%特比萘芬乳膏。搪瓷医学杂志2021;11(1):39-46
Comparative Study of Topical Terbinafine 1% Cream versus Butenafine 1% Cream in the Treatment of Tinea Cruris
Background: Tinea cruris constitutes a major health problem worldwide. Although not lifethreatening, it can cause significant discomfort in daily activities. So, search for better therapeutic options in terms of clinical efficacy and safety profile is ongoing.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine 1% and butenafine 1% cream in the treatment of tinea cruris.
Materials and Methods: This Comparative interventional study was carried out in the Dermatology & Venereology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University between October 2014 and March 2015. A total of 50 patients of tinea cruris who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent were enrolled in the study. They were then divided into two groups as Group A (terbinafine group) and Group B (butenafine group) in a 1:1 ratio following a simple randomization method. Patients were advised to apply the medication once daily for 2 weeks and evaluated on the basis of clinical assessment score at the end of 1 and 2 weeks.
Results: The baseline socio-demographic characteristics of the two groups were not statistically significantly different. Higher clinical cure was observed in butenafine recipients as compared with terbinafine recipients on the basis of mean clinical assessment score at the end of 7 days (5.72±0.7 vs 4.12±0.7) and 14 days (3.04±0.5 vs 1.44±0.9). The difference was statistically significant at both the time points. Both the drugs were well-tolerated except one patient of terbinafine group complained of transient burning.
Conclusion: Treatment with butenafine 1% cream can be considered superior to terbinafine 1% cream in case of tinea cruris.
J Enam Med Col 2021; 11(1): 39-46