下吸式气化器中生物质气化制氢过程的环境和热力学性能评估

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Tayebeh Marzoughi, F. Samimi, M. Rahimpour
{"title":"下吸式气化器中生物质气化制氢过程的环境和热力学性能评估","authors":"Tayebeh Marzoughi, F. Samimi, M. Rahimpour","doi":"10.1515/cppm-2021-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gasification is one of the most efficient techniques for sustainable hydrogen production from biomass. In this study, a comparative performance analysis of the gasification process using various types of biomass materials was undertaken via thermodynamic approach. Air, steam, and air/steam as the traditional gasifying agents were applied to provide an opportunity to choose the most proper agent in the process. This paper also evaluates the environmental impacts of the process in terms of CO2 emission by using Aspen Energy Analyzer. The effects of agent to biomass molar ratio, agent inlet temperature, moisture content of biomass material, and gasification temperature were estimated based on the producer gas compositions, hydrogen yield and heating values. The results indicate that the highest hydrogen yield (0.074 g H2/g biomass) was obtained in the steam gasification of plastic, while air gasification of paper generates the lowest one. It was also observed that manure is the most beneficial from environmental perspectives, while tire and plastic have the highest contribution to CO2 emission and consequently global warming. The higher values of hydrogen production and LHV of produced gas are associated respectively with using steam, air/steam, and air as the gasification agents. The lowest value of CO2 emission is obtained for air, air/steam, and steam as the gasifying agents, respectively.","PeriodicalId":9935,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","volume":"17 1","pages":"637 - 654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cppm-2021-0029","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and thermodynamic performance assessment of biomass gasification process for hydrogen production in a downdraft gasifier\",\"authors\":\"Tayebeh Marzoughi, F. Samimi, M. Rahimpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cppm-2021-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Gasification is one of the most efficient techniques for sustainable hydrogen production from biomass. In this study, a comparative performance analysis of the gasification process using various types of biomass materials was undertaken via thermodynamic approach. Air, steam, and air/steam as the traditional gasifying agents were applied to provide an opportunity to choose the most proper agent in the process. This paper also evaluates the environmental impacts of the process in terms of CO2 emission by using Aspen Energy Analyzer. The effects of agent to biomass molar ratio, agent inlet temperature, moisture content of biomass material, and gasification temperature were estimated based on the producer gas compositions, hydrogen yield and heating values. The results indicate that the highest hydrogen yield (0.074 g H2/g biomass) was obtained in the steam gasification of plastic, while air gasification of paper generates the lowest one. It was also observed that manure is the most beneficial from environmental perspectives, while tire and plastic have the highest contribution to CO2 emission and consequently global warming. The higher values of hydrogen production and LHV of produced gas are associated respectively with using steam, air/steam, and air as the gasification agents. The lowest value of CO2 emission is obtained for air, air/steam, and steam as the gasifying agents, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Product and Process Modeling\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"637 - 654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cppm-2021-0029\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Product and Process Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2021-0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2021-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要气化是生物质可持续制氢的最有效技术之一。在本研究中,通过热力学方法对使用各种类型生物质材料的气化过程进行了比较性能分析。应用空气、蒸汽和空气/蒸汽作为传统的气化剂,为在该过程中选择最合适的气化剂提供了机会。本文还使用Aspen Energy Analyzer从二氧化碳排放的角度评估了该工艺对环境的影响。基于生产商气体组成、氢气产量和热值,估计了药剂与生物质摩尔比、药剂入口温度、生物质材料的水分含量和气化温度的影响。结果表明,塑料的蒸汽气化产氢量最高(0.074gH2/g生物质),而纸张的空气气化产氢率最低。还观察到,从环境角度来看,粪肥是最有益的,而轮胎和塑料对二氧化碳排放和全球变暖的贡献最大。所产生的气体的氢气产量和LHV的较高值分别与使用蒸汽、空气/蒸汽和空气作为气化剂有关。对于作为气化剂的空气、空气/蒸汽和蒸汽,分别获得CO2排放的最低值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental and thermodynamic performance assessment of biomass gasification process for hydrogen production in a downdraft gasifier
Abstract Gasification is one of the most efficient techniques for sustainable hydrogen production from biomass. In this study, a comparative performance analysis of the gasification process using various types of biomass materials was undertaken via thermodynamic approach. Air, steam, and air/steam as the traditional gasifying agents were applied to provide an opportunity to choose the most proper agent in the process. This paper also evaluates the environmental impacts of the process in terms of CO2 emission by using Aspen Energy Analyzer. The effects of agent to biomass molar ratio, agent inlet temperature, moisture content of biomass material, and gasification temperature were estimated based on the producer gas compositions, hydrogen yield and heating values. The results indicate that the highest hydrogen yield (0.074 g H2/g biomass) was obtained in the steam gasification of plastic, while air gasification of paper generates the lowest one. It was also observed that manure is the most beneficial from environmental perspectives, while tire and plastic have the highest contribution to CO2 emission and consequently global warming. The higher values of hydrogen production and LHV of produced gas are associated respectively with using steam, air/steam, and air as the gasification agents. The lowest value of CO2 emission is obtained for air, air/steam, and steam as the gasifying agents, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Chemical Product and Process Modeling ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Topics: equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信