体外除颤计算模型的验证与适用性分析

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Joshua J. E. Blauer, R. Gray, D. Swenson, P. Pathmanathan
{"title":"体外除颤计算模型的验证与适用性分析","authors":"Joshua J. E. Blauer, R. Gray, D. Swenson, P. Pathmanathan","doi":"10.1115/1.4056596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Survival rates for sudden cardiac death treated with external defibrillation are estimated to be up to five times greater compared to cardio-pulmonary resuscitation alone. Computational modeling can be used to investigate the relationship between patch location and defibrillation efficacy. However, credibility of model predictions is unclear. The aims of this paper are to: (1) assess credibility of a commonly used computational approach for predicting impact of patch relocation on defibrillation efficacy; and (2) provide a concrete biomedical example of a model validation study with supporting applicability analysis, to systematically assess the relevance of the validation study for a proposed model context of use (COU). Using an electrostatic heart and torso computational model, simulations were compared against experimental recordings from a swine subject with external patches and multiple body surface and intracardiac recording electrodes. Applicability of this swine validation study to the human COU was assessed using an applicability analysis framework. Knowledge gaps identified by the applicability analysis were addressed using sensitivity analysis. In the swine validation study, quantitative agreement (R2=0.85) was observed between predicted and observed potentials at both surface and intracardiac electrodes using a left-right patch placement. Applicability analysis identified uncertainty in tissue conductivities as one of the main potential sources of unreliability; however, a sensitivity analysis demonstrated that uncertainty in conductivity parameters had relatively little impact on model predictions (less than 10% relative change for two-fold conductivity changes). We believe the results support pursuing human simulations further to evaluate impact of patch relocation.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and Applicability Analysis of a Computational Model of External Defibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Joshua J. E. Blauer, R. Gray, D. Swenson, P. Pathmanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4056596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Survival rates for sudden cardiac death treated with external defibrillation are estimated to be up to five times greater compared to cardio-pulmonary resuscitation alone. Computational modeling can be used to investigate the relationship between patch location and defibrillation efficacy. However, credibility of model predictions is unclear. The aims of this paper are to: (1) assess credibility of a commonly used computational approach for predicting impact of patch relocation on defibrillation efficacy; and (2) provide a concrete biomedical example of a model validation study with supporting applicability analysis, to systematically assess the relevance of the validation study for a proposed model context of use (COU). Using an electrostatic heart and torso computational model, simulations were compared against experimental recordings from a swine subject with external patches and multiple body surface and intracardiac recording electrodes. Applicability of this swine validation study to the human COU was assessed using an applicability analysis framework. Knowledge gaps identified by the applicability analysis were addressed using sensitivity analysis. In the swine validation study, quantitative agreement (R2=0.85) was observed between predicted and observed potentials at both surface and intracardiac electrodes using a left-right patch placement. Applicability analysis identified uncertainty in tissue conductivities as one of the main potential sources of unreliability; however, a sensitivity analysis demonstrated that uncertainty in conductivity parameters had relatively little impact on model predictions (less than 10% relative change for two-fold conductivity changes). We believe the results support pursuing human simulations further to evaluate impact of patch relocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外除颤治疗的心源性猝死的存活率估计比单独心肺复苏高5倍。计算模型可以用来研究贴片位置和除颤效果之间的关系。然而,模型预测的可信度尚不清楚。本文的目的是:(1)评估用于预测贴片重新定位对除颤效果影响的常用计算方法的可信度;(2)提供一个具体的生物医学模型验证研究的例子,并进行适用性分析,以系统地评估验证研究与提议的模型使用背景(COU)的相关性。使用静电心脏和躯干计算模型,将模拟结果与猪受试者的实验记录进行了比较,实验记录带有外部贴片和多个体表和心内记录电极。使用适用性分析框架评估了该猪验证研究对人类COU的适用性。通过适用性分析确定的知识差距使用敏感性分析解决。在猪验证研究中,使用左右贴片放置的体表和心内电极的预测电位和观察电位之间的定量一致性(R2=0.85)。适用性分析将组织电导率的不确定性确定为不可靠性的主要潜在来源之一;然而,敏感性分析表明,电导率参数的不确定性对模型预测的影响相对较小(两倍电导率变化的相对变化小于10%)。我们认为,这些结果支持进一步进行人类模拟,以评估斑块迁移的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and Applicability Analysis of a Computational Model of External Defibrillation
Survival rates for sudden cardiac death treated with external defibrillation are estimated to be up to five times greater compared to cardio-pulmonary resuscitation alone. Computational modeling can be used to investigate the relationship between patch location and defibrillation efficacy. However, credibility of model predictions is unclear. The aims of this paper are to: (1) assess credibility of a commonly used computational approach for predicting impact of patch relocation on defibrillation efficacy; and (2) provide a concrete biomedical example of a model validation study with supporting applicability analysis, to systematically assess the relevance of the validation study for a proposed model context of use (COU). Using an electrostatic heart and torso computational model, simulations were compared against experimental recordings from a swine subject with external patches and multiple body surface and intracardiac recording electrodes. Applicability of this swine validation study to the human COU was assessed using an applicability analysis framework. Knowledge gaps identified by the applicability analysis were addressed using sensitivity analysis. In the swine validation study, quantitative agreement (R2=0.85) was observed between predicted and observed potentials at both surface and intracardiac electrodes using a left-right patch placement. Applicability analysis identified uncertainty in tissue conductivities as one of the main potential sources of unreliability; however, a sensitivity analysis demonstrated that uncertainty in conductivity parameters had relatively little impact on model predictions (less than 10% relative change for two-fold conductivity changes). We believe the results support pursuing human simulations further to evaluate impact of patch relocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信