发展援助与国内区域不平等:以缅甸为例

IF 1.7 2区 经济学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Matteo Fumagalli, A. Kemmerling
{"title":"发展援助与国内区域不平等:以缅甸为例","authors":"Matteo Fumagalli, A. Kemmerling","doi":"10.1080/15387216.2022.2134167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a cyclical nature to the dilemmas confronting international donors willing to operate in Myanmar. Brief periods of relative openness led to rapid surges in development assistance, regularly interrupted by long phases of military rule and disengagement by donors. Amidst all this, many predicaments remain. This article engages with one of them: the inequality between regions. How have international donors reacted to the issue of domestic regional inequality? Recent studies suggest that official development assistance (ODA) does not target poor regions very well, but it is not always clear why this is the case. Myanmar’s sudden, yet uneven and unequal liberalization from 2011 to 2021 catalyzed huge inflows of ODA, while it also confronted donors with new policy dilemmas. The article shows that aid providers struggle with the problem of rising regional inequality, especially for political reasons. Donor and recipi- ent interests often do not align well on this issue. In the case of Myanmar, donors who press for regional inequality to sit prominently on the agenda might fare less successfully than those who address the issue indirectly. The article concludes that regional inequality and the politics of targeting deserve a more central role in the political economy of ODA.","PeriodicalId":47508,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development aid and domestic regional inequality: the case of Myanmar\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Fumagalli, A. Kemmerling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15387216.2022.2134167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a cyclical nature to the dilemmas confronting international donors willing to operate in Myanmar. Brief periods of relative openness led to rapid surges in development assistance, regularly interrupted by long phases of military rule and disengagement by donors. Amidst all this, many predicaments remain. This article engages with one of them: the inequality between regions. How have international donors reacted to the issue of domestic regional inequality? Recent studies suggest that official development assistance (ODA) does not target poor regions very well, but it is not always clear why this is the case. Myanmar’s sudden, yet uneven and unequal liberalization from 2011 to 2021 catalyzed huge inflows of ODA, while it also confronted donors with new policy dilemmas. The article shows that aid providers struggle with the problem of rising regional inequality, especially for political reasons. Donor and recipi- ent interests often do not align well on this issue. In the case of Myanmar, donors who press for regional inequality to sit prominently on the agenda might fare less successfully than those who address the issue indirectly. The article concludes that regional inequality and the politics of targeting deserve a more central role in the political economy of ODA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Geography and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2022.2134167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2022.2134167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

愿意在缅甸开展业务的国际捐助者所面临的困境具有周期性。短暂的相对开放导致发展援助迅速增加,经常被长期的军事统治和捐助者的脱离接触所打断。在这一切之中,仍然存在许多困境。这篇文章涉及其中一个问题:地区之间的不平等。国际捐助者对国内区域不平等问题有何反应?最近的研究表明,官方发展援助并没有很好地针对贫困地区,但并不总是清楚为什么会出现这种情况。2011年至2021年,缅甸突然但不均衡和不平等的自由化促进了官方发展援助的大量流入,同时也使捐助者面临新的政策困境。这篇文章表明,援助提供者正在努力解决地区不平等加剧的问题,特别是出于政治原因。在这个问题上,捐助者和接受者的利益往往不太一致。以缅甸为例,那些敦促将地区不平等问题放在议程上突出位置的捐助者可能不如那些间接解决这一问题的捐助者成功。文章的结论是,区域不平等和目标政治应该在官方发展援助的政治经济中发挥更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development aid and domestic regional inequality: the case of Myanmar
There is a cyclical nature to the dilemmas confronting international donors willing to operate in Myanmar. Brief periods of relative openness led to rapid surges in development assistance, regularly interrupted by long phases of military rule and disengagement by donors. Amidst all this, many predicaments remain. This article engages with one of them: the inequality between regions. How have international donors reacted to the issue of domestic regional inequality? Recent studies suggest that official development assistance (ODA) does not target poor regions very well, but it is not always clear why this is the case. Myanmar’s sudden, yet uneven and unequal liberalization from 2011 to 2021 catalyzed huge inflows of ODA, while it also confronted donors with new policy dilemmas. The article shows that aid providers struggle with the problem of rising regional inequality, especially for political reasons. Donor and recipi- ent interests often do not align well on this issue. In the case of Myanmar, donors who press for regional inequality to sit prominently on the agenda might fare less successfully than those who address the issue indirectly. The article concludes that regional inequality and the politics of targeting deserve a more central role in the political economy of ODA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Eurasian Geography and Economics, a bimonthly affiliated with the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies and the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies , will publish timely, original papers in geography and economics covering all states of the former USSR as well as Asiatic and European countries on or beyond their present borders within the Eurasian realm , with a particular emphasis on China .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信