食品损失法律与政策奖学金引用的灰色文献综述

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY
Angela Hackstadt
{"title":"食品损失法律与政策奖学金引用的灰色文献综述","authors":"Angela Hackstadt","doi":"10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the United States, state and federal programs, rules, and legislation attempt to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of food waste. Research on the efficacy of these interventions rely on a variety of grey literature resources. Grey literature is valuable to policy research but may be overlooked because it is not published commercially and is often deemed unauthoritative. This review focuses on the use of grey literature in food waste law and policy scholarship to identify the most used sources and to determine what, if any, archiving strategies authors use. Recommendations for librarians and researchers are discussed. This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.","PeriodicalId":43986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","volume":"22 1","pages":"22 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Grey Literature Cited by Food Loss Law and Policy Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"Angela Hackstadt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the United States, state and federal programs, rules, and legislation attempt to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of food waste. Research on the efficacy of these interventions rely on a variety of grey literature resources. Grey literature is valuable to policy research but may be overlooked because it is not published commercially and is often deemed unauthoritative. This review focuses on the use of grey literature in food waste law and policy scholarship to identify the most used sources and to determine what, if any, archiving strategies authors use. Recommendations for librarians and researchers are discussed. This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2021.1891546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在美国,州和联邦的计划、规则和立法试图解决食物浪费对社会、经济和环境的影响。对这些干预措施有效性的研究依赖于各种灰色文献资源。灰色文献对政策研究是有价值的,但可能被忽视,因为它不是商业出版的,往往被认为是不权威的。本综述侧重于灰色文献在食物浪费法律和政策奖学金中的使用,以确定最常用的来源,并确定作者使用的存档策略。讨论了对图书馆员和研究人员的建议。这篇文章经过一些小改动后重新发布。这些变化不影响文章的学术内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Grey Literature Cited by Food Loss Law and Policy Scholarship
ABSTRACT In the United States, state and federal programs, rules, and legislation attempt to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of food waste. Research on the efficacy of these interventions rely on a variety of grey literature resources. Grey literature is valuable to policy research but may be overlooked because it is not published commercially and is often deemed unauthoritative. This review focuses on the use of grey literature in food waste law and policy scholarship to identify the most used sources and to determine what, if any, archiving strategies authors use. Recommendations for librarians and researchers are discussed. This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信