惩罚性损害赔偿,特别是为了保护消费者的集体或分散利益

Q4 Social Sciences
Gabriel Hernández-Paulsen, M. Ponce-Márquez
{"title":"惩罚性损害赔偿,特别是为了保护消费者的集体或分散利益","authors":"Gabriel Hernández-Paulsen, M. Ponce-Márquez","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722022000100063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"proveedores, cuestionable la reglamentación de su cuantificación; This paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496, with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and ques tionable aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer pro tection, through a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, biblio graphy and national and foreign jurisprudence, which allows a qualitative ana lysis of such sources in order to present and elaborate the hypothesis, theoretical frame work, reflections and conclusions. In sections i and ii , a theoretical frame work is formulated, represented by an approach to punitive damages on the basis of national and comparative backgraunds, through the spe cific study of their nature and function, and it application in Chile by reviewing the discussions that have taken place in this regard, particularly regarding the alleged problems of constitutionality and the reparatory nature of civil liability. The hypothesis is that the regulation of puniti ve damages in the aforementioned law is positive because it contributes to sanctioning, deterring and preventing serious supplier miscon duct, but questionable with respect to the regulation of its quan tification; aspects that are developed in section iii .","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DAÑOS PUNITIVOS, ESPECIALMENTE PARA PROTEGER EL INTERÉS COLECTIVO O DIFUSO DE LOS CONSUMIDORES\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Hernández-Paulsen, M. Ponce-Márquez\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-80722022000100063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"proveedores, cuestionable la reglamentación de su cuantificación; This paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496, with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and ques tionable aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer pro tection, through a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, biblio graphy and national and foreign jurisprudence, which allows a qualitative ana lysis of such sources in order to present and elaborate the hypothesis, theoretical frame work, reflections and conclusions. In sections i and ii , a theoretical frame work is formulated, represented by an approach to punitive damages on the basis of national and comparative backgraunds, through the spe cific study of their nature and function, and it application in Chile by reviewing the discussions that have taken place in this regard, particularly regarding the alleged problems of constitutionality and the reparatory nature of civil liability. The hypothesis is that the regulation of puniti ve damages in the aforementioned law is positive because it contributes to sanctioning, deterring and preventing serious supplier miscon duct, but questionable with respect to the regulation of its quan tification; aspects that are developed in section iii .\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722022000100063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722022000100063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,这是一个值得注意的问题;本文对19496号法律规定的惩罚性赔偿进行了批判性研究,目的是在消费者保护的框架下,通过基于法规、文献学和国内外法学的教条主义方法,发现和评估其规定的积极和可质疑的方面,它允许对这些来源进行定性分析,以提出和阐述假设、理论框架、反思和结论。在第一节和第二节中,制定了一个理论框架,以基于国家和比较背景的惩罚性赔偿方法为代表,通过对其性质和功能的具体研究,以及通过审查在这方面进行的讨论在智利的应用,特别是关于所谓的合宪性和民事责任的赔偿性质问题。该假设认为,上述法律中对惩罚性损害的规定是积极的,因为它有助于制裁、威慑和防止严重的供应商不当行为,但对其处罚的规定值得怀疑;第三节中发展的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DAÑOS PUNITIVOS, ESPECIALMENTE PARA PROTEGER EL INTERÉS COLECTIVO O DIFUSO DE LOS CONSUMIDORES
proveedores, cuestionable la reglamentación de su cuantificación; This paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496, with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and ques tionable aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer pro tection, through a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, biblio graphy and national and foreign jurisprudence, which allows a qualitative ana lysis of such sources in order to present and elaborate the hypothesis, theoretical frame work, reflections and conclusions. In sections i and ii , a theoretical frame work is formulated, represented by an approach to punitive damages on the basis of national and comparative backgraunds, through the spe cific study of their nature and function, and it application in Chile by reviewing the discussions that have taken place in this regard, particularly regarding the alleged problems of constitutionality and the reparatory nature of civil liability. The hypothesis is that the regulation of puniti ve damages in the aforementioned law is positive because it contributes to sanctioning, deterring and preventing serious supplier miscon duct, but questionable with respect to the regulation of its quan tification; aspects that are developed in section iii .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信