重新构想公共卫生

Q3 Medicine
Julian Abel, Allan Kellehear
{"title":"重新构想公共卫生","authors":"Julian Abel,&nbsp;Allan Kellehear","doi":"10.1002/lim2.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay offers a critical assessment and reflection on the field of public health based on policy directions and themes gleaned from the historical story of John Snow and the Broad Street pump in 19th century London and recent international responses to Covid-19. Dominant public health strategies, especially for infectious disease emergencies, demonstrate a persistent tendency towards authoritarian claims about science that marginalise concerns about human rights, showing disregard for interprofessional and partnership working, antipathy toward critical voices and a retreat into old ideas about death and dying as medical failure. There is also neglect of the fundamental importance of social relationships as a primary source of health and well-being. Recommendations for a more positive approach for the future of public health are made. These include restoration of, and recommitment to, partnership working with communities, experiential literacy, the prioritising of social support and incentives over negative sanctions, and the acknowledgement and support of end-of-life experiences as a focus for special and overdue public health attention. These suggestions advocate for the application of ‘new’ public health priorities to address and rebalance the limitations of the old, usual approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":74076,"journal":{"name":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.76","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public health reimagined\",\"authors\":\"Julian Abel,&nbsp;Allan Kellehear\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lim2.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This essay offers a critical assessment and reflection on the field of public health based on policy directions and themes gleaned from the historical story of John Snow and the Broad Street pump in 19th century London and recent international responses to Covid-19. Dominant public health strategies, especially for infectious disease emergencies, demonstrate a persistent tendency towards authoritarian claims about science that marginalise concerns about human rights, showing disregard for interprofessional and partnership working, antipathy toward critical voices and a retreat into old ideas about death and dying as medical failure. There is also neglect of the fundamental importance of social relationships as a primary source of health and well-being. Recommendations for a more positive approach for the future of public health are made. These include restoration of, and recommitment to, partnership working with communities, experiential literacy, the prioritising of social support and incentives over negative sanctions, and the acknowledgement and support of end-of-life experiences as a focus for special and overdue public health attention. These suggestions advocate for the application of ‘new’ public health priorities to address and rebalance the limitations of the old, usual approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.76\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文根据从19世纪伦敦的约翰·斯诺和宽街水泵的历史故事以及最近对Covid-19的国际反应中收集的政策方向和主题,对公共卫生领域进行了批判性的评估和反思。主要的公共卫生战略,特别是针对传染病紧急情况的公共卫生战略,显示出一种对科学的专制主张的持续趋势,这种主张将对人权的关切边缘化,表现出对专业间和伙伴关系工作的漠视,对批评声音的反感,并退回到将死亡和死亡视为医疗失败的旧观念。人们还忽视了社会关系作为健康和幸福的主要来源的根本重要性。为公共卫生的未来提出了更积极的建议。这些措施包括恢复和重新致力于与社区合作的伙伴关系、体验式扫盲、优先考虑社会支持和奖励而不是消极制裁,以及承认和支持将临终经历作为特别和迟来的公共卫生关注的重点。这些建议提倡应用“新的”公共卫生优先事项,以解决和重新平衡旧的常规方法的局限性。©2023作者。John Wiley & Sons Ltd出版的《生活方式医学》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public health reimagined

This essay offers a critical assessment and reflection on the field of public health based on policy directions and themes gleaned from the historical story of John Snow and the Broad Street pump in 19th century London and recent international responses to Covid-19. Dominant public health strategies, especially for infectious disease emergencies, demonstrate a persistent tendency towards authoritarian claims about science that marginalise concerns about human rights, showing disregard for interprofessional and partnership working, antipathy toward critical voices and a retreat into old ideas about death and dying as medical failure. There is also neglect of the fundamental importance of social relationships as a primary source of health and well-being. Recommendations for a more positive approach for the future of public health are made. These include restoration of, and recommitment to, partnership working with communities, experiential literacy, the prioritising of social support and incentives over negative sanctions, and the acknowledgement and support of end-of-life experiences as a focus for special and overdue public health attention. These suggestions advocate for the application of ‘new’ public health priorities to address and rebalance the limitations of the old, usual approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信