农村社区的社会经济和环境指标:弥合学术和实践差距

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
C. Brinkley, Marjory Anne Visser
{"title":"农村社区的社会经济和环境指标:弥合学术和实践差距","authors":"C. Brinkley, Marjory Anne Visser","doi":"10.1177/08912424221083023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of large acreages, sparse populations, and distinct sociopolitical dynamics, many rural communities are beginning to assemble their own sets of economic indicators to fit unique policy agendas. This review summarizes over 30 years of practical efforts from six regions that created economic development reports. Reports cover 60% of the nonmetro counties in the United States. Over half the reports were issued in the last 5 years. To understand distinctions between scholarly efforts and how communities leverage publicly available data sets toward policy objectives, the authors compare the rural, regional economic development reports assembled through community partnerships with indicators recommended in rural wealth creation literature. The authors identify a gap in scholarship and practice with implications for how practitioners and researchers conceptualize the creation of wealth in rural areas and conclude with best-practice approaches to co-creating rural economic indicator reports, especially where data can be tailored precisely to rural areas.","PeriodicalId":47367,"journal":{"name":"Economic Development Quarterly","volume":"36 1","pages":"75 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic and Environmental Indicators for Rural Communities: Bridging the Scholarly and Practice Gap\",\"authors\":\"C. Brinkley, Marjory Anne Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08912424221083023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because of large acreages, sparse populations, and distinct sociopolitical dynamics, many rural communities are beginning to assemble their own sets of economic indicators to fit unique policy agendas. This review summarizes over 30 years of practical efforts from six regions that created economic development reports. Reports cover 60% of the nonmetro counties in the United States. Over half the reports were issued in the last 5 years. To understand distinctions between scholarly efforts and how communities leverage publicly available data sets toward policy objectives, the authors compare the rural, regional economic development reports assembled through community partnerships with indicators recommended in rural wealth creation literature. The authors identify a gap in scholarship and practice with implications for how practitioners and researchers conceptualize the creation of wealth in rural areas and conclude with best-practice approaches to co-creating rural economic indicator reports, especially where data can be tailored precisely to rural areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Development Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Development Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221083023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221083023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于土地面积大,人口稀少,社会政治动态不同,许多农村社区开始汇编自己的一套经济指标,以适应独特的政策议程。本报告总结了6个编制经济发展报告的地区30多年来的实际努力。报告覆盖了美国60%的非都市县。超过一半的报告是在过去5年发布的。为了理解学术努力和社区如何利用公开数据集实现政策目标之间的区别,作者将通过社区伙伴关系收集的农村地区经济发展报告与农村财富创造文献中推荐的指标进行了比较。作者指出了学术和实践上的差距,这对实践者和研究人员如何概念化农村地区财富创造产生了影响,并总结了共同创建农村经济指标报告的最佳实践方法,特别是在数据可以精确地针对农村地区的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic and Environmental Indicators for Rural Communities: Bridging the Scholarly and Practice Gap
Because of large acreages, sparse populations, and distinct sociopolitical dynamics, many rural communities are beginning to assemble their own sets of economic indicators to fit unique policy agendas. This review summarizes over 30 years of practical efforts from six regions that created economic development reports. Reports cover 60% of the nonmetro counties in the United States. Over half the reports were issued in the last 5 years. To understand distinctions between scholarly efforts and how communities leverage publicly available data sets toward policy objectives, the authors compare the rural, regional economic development reports assembled through community partnerships with indicators recommended in rural wealth creation literature. The authors identify a gap in scholarship and practice with implications for how practitioners and researchers conceptualize the creation of wealth in rural areas and conclude with best-practice approaches to co-creating rural economic indicator reports, especially where data can be tailored precisely to rural areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Economic development—jobs, income, and community prosperity—is a continuing challenge to modern society. To meet this challenge, economic developers must use imagination and common sense, coupled with the tools of public and private finance, politics, planning, micro- and macroeconomics, engineering, and real estate. In short, the art of economic development must be supported by the science of research. And only one journal—Economic Development Quarterly: The Journal of American Economic Revitalization (EDQ)—effectively bridges the gap between academics, policy makers, and practitioners and links the various economic development communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信