以行为为基础的安全2022:今天的证据

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
J. Spigener, Gennifer Lyon, Terry McSween
{"title":"以行为为基础的安全2022:今天的证据","authors":"J. Spigener, Gennifer Lyon, Terry McSween","doi":"10.1080/01608061.2022.2048943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The empirical basis for behavior-based safety (BBS) continues to mature and provide guidance to both practitioners and companies. This paper will share the results of a recent study conducted by Cambridge University using data provided from DEKRA clients. The study involves 88 international clients who provided over 1.3 million observational data points, including monthly incident and culture survey data. The findings challenge traditional assumptions about BBS initiatives. For example, the study strongly suggests that having a limited number of “dedicated observers” is more effective than processes that encourage all employees to participate. The data also suggest that being observed once a month is more effective than more frequent observations. Further, the data illustrate how using observers familiar with tasks is more effective than using observers “with a fresh pair of eyes.” Additional data are presented on other elements of BBS along with a summary of implications for BBS practitioners.","PeriodicalId":51667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavior-based safety 2022: today’s evidence\",\"authors\":\"J. Spigener, Gennifer Lyon, Terry McSween\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01608061.2022.2048943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The empirical basis for behavior-based safety (BBS) continues to mature and provide guidance to both practitioners and companies. This paper will share the results of a recent study conducted by Cambridge University using data provided from DEKRA clients. The study involves 88 international clients who provided over 1.3 million observational data points, including monthly incident and culture survey data. The findings challenge traditional assumptions about BBS initiatives. For example, the study strongly suggests that having a limited number of “dedicated observers” is more effective than processes that encourage all employees to participate. The data also suggest that being observed once a month is more effective than more frequent observations. Further, the data illustrate how using observers familiar with tasks is more effective than using observers “with a fresh pair of eyes.” Additional data are presented on other elements of BBS along with a summary of implications for BBS practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2022.2048943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2022.2048943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基于行为的安全(BBS)的经验基础不断成熟,并为从业者和公司提供指导。本文将分享剑桥大学最近使用DEKRA客户提供的数据进行的一项研究的结果。这项研究涉及88个国际客户,他们提供了超过130万个观察数据点,包括每月的事件和文化调查数据。这些发现挑战了传统的关于BBS倡议的假设。例如,该研究强烈表明,拥有数量有限的“专门观察员”比鼓励所有员工参与的流程更有效。数据还表明,每月观察一次比更频繁的观察更有效。此外,这些数据还说明,使用熟悉任务的观察者比使用“有一双新鲜眼睛”的观察者更有效。本文还提供了关于BBS其他要素的附加数据,并总结了对BBS从业者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavior-based safety 2022: today’s evidence
ABSTRACT The empirical basis for behavior-based safety (BBS) continues to mature and provide guidance to both practitioners and companies. This paper will share the results of a recent study conducted by Cambridge University using data provided from DEKRA clients. The study involves 88 international clients who provided over 1.3 million observational data points, including monthly incident and culture survey data. The findings challenge traditional assumptions about BBS initiatives. For example, the study strongly suggests that having a limited number of “dedicated observers” is more effective than processes that encourage all employees to participate. The data also suggest that being observed once a month is more effective than more frequent observations. Further, the data illustrate how using observers familiar with tasks is more effective than using observers “with a fresh pair of eyes.” Additional data are presented on other elements of BBS along with a summary of implications for BBS practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
47.60%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior Management—the official journal of the OBM Network (www.obmnetwork.com)—is a periodical devoted specifically to scientific principles to improve organizational performance through behavioral change. The journal publishes research and review articles, reports from the field, discussions, and book reviews on the topics that are critical to today"s organization development practitioners, operations managers, and human resource professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信