对谁的刑事保障?自由主义的犯罪话语倾向于犯罪学对其的解构

Marisa de Freitas, Renan Posella Mandarino, L. Rosa
{"title":"对谁的刑事保障?自由主义的犯罪话语倾向于犯罪学对其的解构","authors":"Marisa de Freitas, Renan Posella Mandarino, L. Rosa","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"portugueshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129O presente artigo versa sobre a efetividade das garantias individuais e o reflexo dessa problematica no acesso a justica penal brasileira. Apesar de o discurso idealista-garantista apresentar os instrumentos possiveis para defesa dos acusados e para isonomia de tratamento aos sujeitos do processo, a realidade processual indica que esse discurso e meramente retorico e limitado ao plano teorico-abstrato, com dificuldades de se concretizar no plano pratico-reformista. O trabalho e bibliografico e desenvolve conceitos relativos a seletividade e as formas de controle do poder punitivo. Para abordagem do tema, partiu-se da perspectiva critica do garantismo penal proposto por Luigi Ferrajoli. Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129The present article deals with the effectiveness of individual guarantees and the reflection of this problem in access to brazilian criminal justice. In spite of the guarantees speech present the possible instruments for the defense of the accused and to equality of treatment to subjects in the process, the reality procedure indicates that this discourse is merely rhetorical and limited to theoretical plane-abstract, with difficulties to achieve practical-reformist. The work is bibliographic and develops concepts concerning the selectivity and the ways of controlling punitive power. To approach the subject, it was assumed the critical perspective of penal guaranteeism proposed by Luigi Ferrajoli.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"38 1","pages":"129-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Garantismo penal para quem? O discurso penal liberal drente à sua desconstrução pela criminologia\",\"authors\":\"Marisa de Freitas, Renan Posella Mandarino, L. Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"portugueshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129O presente artigo versa sobre a efetividade das garantias individuais e o reflexo dessa problematica no acesso a justica penal brasileira. Apesar de o discurso idealista-garantista apresentar os instrumentos possiveis para defesa dos acusados e para isonomia de tratamento aos sujeitos do processo, a realidade processual indica que esse discurso e meramente retorico e limitado ao plano teorico-abstrato, com dificuldades de se concretizar no plano pratico-reformista. O trabalho e bibliografico e desenvolve conceitos relativos a seletividade e as formas de controle do poder punitivo. Para abordagem do tema, partiu-se da perspectiva critica do garantismo penal proposto por Luigi Ferrajoli. Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129The present article deals with the effectiveness of individual guarantees and the reflection of this problem in access to brazilian criminal justice. In spite of the guarantees speech present the possible instruments for the defense of the accused and to equality of treatment to subjects in the process, the reality procedure indicates that this discourse is merely rhetorical and limited to theoretical plane-abstract, with difficulties to achieve practical-reformist. The work is bibliographic and develops concepts concerning the selectivity and the ways of controlling punitive power. To approach the subject, it was assumed the critical perspective of penal guaranteeism proposed by Luigi Ferrajoli.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"129-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了个人保障的有效性以及这一问题在巴西刑事司法途径中的反映。尽管-garantista介绍仪器的演讲的理想价钱给被告的辩护和isonomia治疗过程的程序,现实表明,演讲,只是离开和有限teorico计划-abstrato困难的实现计划从事集团。这项工作是书目的,并发展了与选择性和惩罚性权力控制形式有关的概念。为了解决这一问题,我们从费拉约利提出的刑事保障主义的批判视角出发。Englishhttp:// dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129本条款涉及个人保障的效力以及在诉诸巴西刑事司法方面对这一问题的反映。尽管保证发言提出了在这一过程中为被告人辩护和平等对待被告人的可能手段,但现实程序表明,这一发言只是口头上的,仅限于理论上的抽象计划,难以实现实际的改革。该工作提供了关于惩罚性权力的选择性和控制方式的书目和发展概念。方法的学科,它的出现assumed Luigi Ferrajoli guaranteeism提出刑事的透视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Garantismo penal para quem? O discurso penal liberal drente à sua desconstrução pela criminologia
portugueshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129O presente artigo versa sobre a efetividade das garantias individuais e o reflexo dessa problematica no acesso a justica penal brasileira. Apesar de o discurso idealista-garantista apresentar os instrumentos possiveis para defesa dos acusados e para isonomia de tratamento aos sujeitos do processo, a realidade processual indica que esse discurso e meramente retorico e limitado ao plano teorico-abstrato, com dificuldades de se concretizar no plano pratico-reformista. O trabalho e bibliografico e desenvolve conceitos relativos a seletividade e as formas de controle do poder punitivo. Para abordagem do tema, partiu-se da perspectiva critica do garantismo penal proposto por Luigi Ferrajoli. Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p129The present article deals with the effectiveness of individual guarantees and the reflection of this problem in access to brazilian criminal justice. In spite of the guarantees speech present the possible instruments for the defense of the accused and to equality of treatment to subjects in the process, the reality procedure indicates that this discourse is merely rhetorical and limited to theoretical plane-abstract, with difficulties to achieve practical-reformist. The work is bibliographic and develops concepts concerning the selectivity and the ways of controlling punitive power. To approach the subject, it was assumed the critical perspective of penal guaranteeism proposed by Luigi Ferrajoli.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信