反驳克里斯托弗·j·弗格森对美国心理协会针对男孩和男人的实践指南的批评

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101012

Ronald F. Levant , Ryon C. McDermott , Fredric E. Rabinowitz , Matt Englar-Carlson , Christopher T.H. Liang , Christopher Kilmartin

{"title":"反驳克里斯托弗·j·弗格森对美国心理协会针对男孩和男人的实践指南的批评","authors":"Ronald F. Levant , Ryon C. McDermott , Fredric E. Rabinowitz , Matt Englar-Carlson , Christopher T.H. Liang , Christopher Kilmartin","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>We played significant roles in the development of the APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men (American Psychological Association, 2018). We address Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the Guidelines, making six points: Criticisms of the Guidelines Tend to Reflect Anti-Feminist and Gender Essentialist Perspectives; The Guidelines Followed All Rules and Regulations Set Forth by the APA; The Guidelines Are Routinely Mischaracterized and Distorted By People Who Disagree with Them; APA Guidelines Are not Research Reports, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses; Ferguson Conflates Men With Masculinity; and Ferguson Makes Bold Claims Without Justification or a Familiarity with the Field.</div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rebuttal to Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the American Psychological Association's practice guidelines for boys and men\",\"authors\":\"Ronald F. Levant , Ryon C. McDermott , Fredric E. Rabinowitz , Matt Englar-Carlson , Christopher T.H. Liang , Christopher Kilmartin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>We played significant roles in the development of the APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men (American Psychological Association, 2018). We address Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the Guidelines, making six points: Criticisms of the Guidelines Tend to Reflect Anti-Feminist and Gender Essentialist Perspectives; The Guidelines Followed All Rules and Regulations Set Forth by the APA; The Guidelines Are Routinely Mischaracterized and Distorted By People Who Disagree with Them; APA Guidelines Are not Research Reports, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses; Ferguson Conflates Men With Masculinity; and Ferguson Makes Bold Claims Without Justification or a Familiarity with the Field.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000053\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在APA男孩和男人心理实践指南的制定中发挥了重要作用(美国心理协会，2018)。我们针对克里斯托弗·j·弗格森对《指导方针》的批评，提出了六点:对《指导方针》的批评倾向于反映反女权主义和性别本质主义的观点;该指南遵循APA制定的所有规则和条例;这些指导方针经常被持不同意见的人误解和歪曲;APA指南不是研究报告、系统评价或元分析;弗格森将男人与男子气概混为一谈;弗格森在没有正当理由或不熟悉这个领域的情况下发表了大胆的言论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rebuttal to Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the American Psychological Association's practice guidelines for boys and men

We played significant roles in the development of the APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men (American Psychological Association, 2018). We address Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the Guidelines, making six points: Criticisms of the Guidelines Tend to Reflect Anti-Feminist and Gender Essentialist Perspectives; The Guidelines Followed All Rules and Regulations Set Forth by the APA; The Guidelines Are Routinely Mischaracterized and Distorted By People Who Disagree with Them; APA Guidelines Are not Research Reports, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses; Ferguson Conflates Men With Masculinity; and Ferguson Makes Bold Claims Without Justification or a Familiarity with the Field.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Ideas in Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.