医生被告知他们在回归工作和工人补偿制度中的作用是什么?加拿大资源分析

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Kosny, M. Lifshen, E. MacEachen, A. Furlan, M. Koehoorn, D. Beaton, Juliette E Cooper, B. Neis
{"title":"医生被告知他们在回归工作和工人补偿制度中的作用是什么?加拿大资源分析","authors":"A. Kosny, M. Lifshen, E. MacEachen, A. Furlan, M. Koehoorn, D. Beaton, Juliette E Cooper, B. Neis","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Physicians can struggle in managing return to work (RTW) consultations and facilitating a patient’s return to employment after the injury. As part of an exploration into the role of physicians in RTW, we examined resources, policies and guidelines developed for physicians. We identified resources developed by workers’ compensation boards, government bodies and other organizations across Canada. Materials were categorized by resource type, content and jurisdiction. A content analysis focused on key messages and discourse about what is expected of physicians and how they are instructed to behave as part of the workers’ compensation process. Analysis was informed by key issues identified in the critical qualitative RTW literature and involved the consideration of gaps, contradictions and ’silences’ in the data. While physicians are urged to encourage RTW, few resources explain how the workers’ compensation system operates and their role within it. There is a dearth of resources that address complex conditions and difficulties physicians may encounter while treating patients with compensable injuries. These gaps may hinder physicians’ understanding of their roles and responsibilities and delay workers’ RTW after injury. There is a need for resources aimed at physicians that clearly discuss their role and how to deal with complex conditions and RTW difficulties.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are physicians told about their role in return to work and workers’ compensation systems? An analysis of Canadian resources\",\"authors\":\"A. Kosny, M. Lifshen, E. MacEachen, A. Furlan, M. Koehoorn, D. Beaton, Juliette E Cooper, B. Neis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Physicians can struggle in managing return to work (RTW) consultations and facilitating a patient’s return to employment after the injury. As part of an exploration into the role of physicians in RTW, we examined resources, policies and guidelines developed for physicians. We identified resources developed by workers’ compensation boards, government bodies and other organizations across Canada. Materials were categorized by resource type, content and jurisdiction. A content analysis focused on key messages and discourse about what is expected of physicians and how they are instructed to behave as part of the workers’ compensation process. Analysis was informed by key issues identified in the critical qualitative RTW literature and involved the consideration of gaps, contradictions and ’silences’ in the data. While physicians are urged to encourage RTW, few resources explain how the workers’ compensation system operates and their role within it. There is a dearth of resources that address complex conditions and difficulties physicians may encounter while treating patients with compensable injuries. These gaps may hinder physicians’ understanding of their roles and responsibilities and delay workers’ RTW after injury. There is a need for resources aimed at physicians that clearly discuss their role and how to deal with complex conditions and RTW difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2018.1465264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要医生可以在管理重返工作岗位(RTW)协商和促进病人的伤害后重返就业斗争。作为探索医生在RTW中的作用的一部分,我们研究了为医生制定的资源、政策和指导方针。我们确定了由加拿大各地的工人赔偿委员会、政府机构和其他组织开发的资源。根据资源类型、内容和管辖权对资料进行分类。内容分析侧重于对医生的期望以及他们如何被指示作为工人补偿过程的一部分的关键信息和话语。分析是根据关键的定性RTW文献中确定的关键问题进行的,并涉及考虑数据中的空白、矛盾和“沉默”。虽然医生们被敦促鼓励RTW,但很少有资源解释工人赔偿制度是如何运作的,以及他们在其中的作用。缺乏资源来解决复杂的条件和困难,医生可能会遇到,而治疗患者的赔偿伤害。这些差距可能会阻碍医生对他们的角色和责任的理解,并延迟工人受伤后的RTW。有必要为医生提供资源,明确讨论他们的角色以及如何处理复杂的条件和RTW困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are physicians told about their role in return to work and workers’ compensation systems? An analysis of Canadian resources
Abstract Physicians can struggle in managing return to work (RTW) consultations and facilitating a patient’s return to employment after the injury. As part of an exploration into the role of physicians in RTW, we examined resources, policies and guidelines developed for physicians. We identified resources developed by workers’ compensation boards, government bodies and other organizations across Canada. Materials were categorized by resource type, content and jurisdiction. A content analysis focused on key messages and discourse about what is expected of physicians and how they are instructed to behave as part of the workers’ compensation process. Analysis was informed by key issues identified in the critical qualitative RTW literature and involved the consideration of gaps, contradictions and ’silences’ in the data. While physicians are urged to encourage RTW, few resources explain how the workers’ compensation system operates and their role within it. There is a dearth of resources that address complex conditions and difficulties physicians may encounter while treating patients with compensable injuries. These gaps may hinder physicians’ understanding of their roles and responsibilities and delay workers’ RTW after injury. There is a need for resources aimed at physicians that clearly discuss their role and how to deal with complex conditions and RTW difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信