新辅助化疗在波兰肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的实施:一项单机构回顾性研究

Urologia polska Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-29 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2019.1892
Katarzyna Gronostaj, Anna Katarzyna Czech, Jakub Fronczek, Tomasz Wiatr, Mikolaj Przydacz, Przemyslaw Dudek, Lukasz Curylo, Wojciech Szczeklik, Piotr Chlosta
{"title":"新辅助化疗在波兰肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的实施:一项单机构回顾性研究","authors":"Katarzyna Gronostaj, Anna Katarzyna Czech, Jakub Fronczek, Tomasz Wiatr, Mikolaj Przydacz, Przemyslaw Dudek, Lukasz Curylo, Wojciech Szczeklik, Piotr Chlosta","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2019.1892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Even though the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is well established, NAC has not been widely used in Poland until recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utilization of NAC and its association with survival in MIBC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for MIBC between December 2012 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data were collected in the perioperative period and long-term observation was continued up to August 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 155 patients with a median age of 65 (IQR: 60-69) years was analyzed. In this group, 79 patients (51%) were treated with NAC prior to RC. Patients in the NAC+RC group were younger, more often had a positive smoking history, and had lower preoperative levels of hemoglobin, white blood cells and C-reactive protein. A 90-day complication rate and mortality were similar in both groups and in the entire cohort were equal to 64.5% and 5.2%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) was on average 150 days longer in the RC+NAC group compared to the RC-only group when patients were followed-up for 3 years (95%CI:3 4 - 267; p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated a high utilization of NAC at our institution. The use of NAC was associated with a better prognosis than RC alone and was not associated with an increased morbidity or mortality. Our results support the use NAC as a safe and effective treatment modality in MIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"72 1","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment in Poland: a single institution retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Gronostaj, Anna Katarzyna Czech, Jakub Fronczek, Tomasz Wiatr, Mikolaj Przydacz, Przemyslaw Dudek, Lukasz Curylo, Wojciech Szczeklik, Piotr Chlosta\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2019.1892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Even though the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is well established, NAC has not been widely used in Poland until recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utilization of NAC and its association with survival in MIBC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for MIBC between December 2012 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data were collected in the perioperative period and long-term observation was continued up to August 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 155 patients with a median age of 65 (IQR: 60-69) years was analyzed. In this group, 79 patients (51%) were treated with NAC prior to RC. Patients in the NAC+RC group were younger, more often had a positive smoking history, and had lower preoperative levels of hemoglobin, white blood cells and C-reactive protein. A 90-day complication rate and mortality were similar in both groups and in the entire cohort were equal to 64.5% and 5.2%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) was on average 150 days longer in the RC+NAC group compared to the RC-only group when patients were followed-up for 3 years (95%CI:3 4 - 267; p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated a high utilization of NAC at our institution. The use of NAC was associated with a better prognosis than RC alone and was not associated with an increased morbidity or mortality. Our results support the use NAC as a safe and effective treatment modality in MIBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia polska\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言尽管新辅助化疗(NAC)在治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌症(MIBC)中的生存益处已得到充分证实,但NAC直到最近才在波兰得到广泛应用。我们研究的目的是评估NAC的利用率及其与MIBC生存率的关系。材料和方法将2012年12月至2017年12月期间接受MIBC根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的患者纳入研究。在围手术期收集数据,并持续长期观察至2018年8月。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于估计生存概率。结果分析了155名中位年龄为65岁(IQR:60-69)的患者的样本。在该组中,79名患者(51%)在RC之前接受了NAC治疗。NAC+RC组的患者更年轻,更常有阳性吸烟史,术前血红蛋白、白细胞和C反应蛋白水平较低。两组的90天并发症发生率和死亡率相似,整个队列分别为64.5%和5.2%。当患者随访3年时,与仅RC组相比,RC+NAC组的总生存期(OS)平均延长150天(95%CI:34-267;p=0.011)。结论我们在我们的机构证明了NAC的高利用率。与单独使用RC相比,使用NAC与更好的预后相关,并且与发病率或死亡率的增加无关。我们的研究结果支持将NAC作为一种安全有效的MIBC治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment in Poland: a single institution retrospective study.

Introduction: Even though the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is well established, NAC has not been widely used in Poland until recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utilization of NAC and its association with survival in MIBC.

Material and methods: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for MIBC between December 2012 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data were collected in the perioperative period and long-term observation was continued up to August 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of survival.

Results: A sample of 155 patients with a median age of 65 (IQR: 60-69) years was analyzed. In this group, 79 patients (51%) were treated with NAC prior to RC. Patients in the NAC+RC group were younger, more often had a positive smoking history, and had lower preoperative levels of hemoglobin, white blood cells and C-reactive protein. A 90-day complication rate and mortality were similar in both groups and in the entire cohort were equal to 64.5% and 5.2%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) was on average 150 days longer in the RC+NAC group compared to the RC-only group when patients were followed-up for 3 years (95%CI:3 4 - 267; p = 0.011).

Conclusions: We demonstrated a high utilization of NAC at our institution. The use of NAC was associated with a better prognosis than RC alone and was not associated with an increased morbidity or mortality. Our results support the use NAC as a safe and effective treatment modality in MIBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信