权力圈:弗拉季斯拉夫四世国王的朋友

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Alexandra Ziober
{"title":"权力圈:弗拉季斯拉夫四世国王的朋友","authors":"Alexandra Ziober","doi":"10.1080/14629712.2023.2227525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any early modern ruler had to have devoted supporters. Most of them gathered around the king in order to obtain specific official and financial benefits, and sometimes they had similar political views to the monarch. However, this issue looked a bit different in relation to Vladislav IV Vasa, king of Poland and grand duke of Lithuania, who was considered by the nobility as a sympathetic and easy-going ruler (as opposed to his more secretive father, Sigismund III). Vladislav was a king who made friendships easily, and people close to him were very clearly at the centre of influence and thus political power. One of the main objectives of this article is to indicate when and how the magnates established private contacts with Vladislav as prince and how they developed once he became king. A separate issue discussed centres on categories related to the understanding of friendship as an element of privacy in the early modern period. Through an in-depth analysis of the letters and memoirs left by the elite of the Polish-Lithuanian state, case studies of private friendships emerge, including the King’s close relationships with Adam Kazanowski, Jan Stanislaw Sapieha, Gerard Denhoff, Aleksander Ludwik Radziwiłł, Krzysztof Radziwiłł and several others.","PeriodicalId":37034,"journal":{"name":"Court Historian","volume":"28 1","pages":"114 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Circle of Power: Friends of King Vladislav IV Vasa\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Ziober\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14629712.2023.2227525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Any early modern ruler had to have devoted supporters. Most of them gathered around the king in order to obtain specific official and financial benefits, and sometimes they had similar political views to the monarch. However, this issue looked a bit different in relation to Vladislav IV Vasa, king of Poland and grand duke of Lithuania, who was considered by the nobility as a sympathetic and easy-going ruler (as opposed to his more secretive father, Sigismund III). Vladislav was a king who made friendships easily, and people close to him were very clearly at the centre of influence and thus political power. One of the main objectives of this article is to indicate when and how the magnates established private contacts with Vladislav as prince and how they developed once he became king. A separate issue discussed centres on categories related to the understanding of friendship as an element of privacy in the early modern period. Through an in-depth analysis of the letters and memoirs left by the elite of the Polish-Lithuanian state, case studies of private friendships emerge, including the King’s close relationships with Adam Kazanowski, Jan Stanislaw Sapieha, Gerard Denhoff, Aleksander Ludwik Radziwiłł, Krzysztof Radziwiłł and several others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court Historian\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court Historian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2023.2227525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2023.2227525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

任何早期的现代统治者都必须有忠实的支持者。他们大多聚集在国王周围,以获得特定的官职和经济利益,有时他们与君主有相似的政治观点。然而,对于波兰国王和立陶宛大公弗拉迪斯拉夫四世瓦萨来说,这个问题看起来有点不同,他被贵族认为是一个富有同情心和随和的统治者(与他更神秘的父亲西吉斯蒙德三世相反)。弗拉迪斯拉夫是一个容易交朋友的国王,与他亲近的人显然处于影响力和政治权力的中心。这篇文章的主要目的之一是要指出,当弗拉迪斯拉夫成为王子时,这些权贵们是何时以及如何与他建立私人联系的,以及在他成为国王后,他们是如何发展的。讨论的另一个问题集中在与现代早期将友谊理解为隐私要素相关的类别上。通过对波兰立陶宛国家精英留下的信件和回忆录的深入分析,出现了私人友谊的案例研究,包括国王与亚当·卡扎诺夫斯基、扬·斯坦尼斯拉夫·萨皮哈、杰拉德·登霍夫、亚历山大·路德维克Radziwiłł、克日什托夫Radziwiłł等人的亲密关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the Circle of Power: Friends of King Vladislav IV Vasa
Any early modern ruler had to have devoted supporters. Most of them gathered around the king in order to obtain specific official and financial benefits, and sometimes they had similar political views to the monarch. However, this issue looked a bit different in relation to Vladislav IV Vasa, king of Poland and grand duke of Lithuania, who was considered by the nobility as a sympathetic and easy-going ruler (as opposed to his more secretive father, Sigismund III). Vladislav was a king who made friendships easily, and people close to him were very clearly at the centre of influence and thus political power. One of the main objectives of this article is to indicate when and how the magnates established private contacts with Vladislav as prince and how they developed once he became king. A separate issue discussed centres on categories related to the understanding of friendship as an element of privacy in the early modern period. Through an in-depth analysis of the letters and memoirs left by the elite of the Polish-Lithuanian state, case studies of private friendships emerge, including the King’s close relationships with Adam Kazanowski, Jan Stanislaw Sapieha, Gerard Denhoff, Aleksander Ludwik Radziwiłł, Krzysztof Radziwiłł and several others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Court Historian
Court Historian Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信