忽略了中国因素:来自巴西和墨西哥的证据

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Marco Cepik, Fabrício H. Chagas-Bastos, Rafael R. Ioris
{"title":"忽略了中国因素:来自巴西和墨西哥的证据","authors":"Marco Cepik, Fabrício H. Chagas-Bastos, Rafael R. Ioris","doi":"10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract China’s rapid economic growth created new challenges and opportunities for Latin America over the 2000s. Much ink has been spilt analysing how countries in the region surfed the Chinese wave of commodity-based prosperity. However, there is fertile and quite unexplored territory to analyse how these regional powers in the Global South, from a comparative perspective, have interacted with China as they tried to improve their international position over the 2000s. We analyse in this article how Brazil and Mexico dealt with China’s presence and strategic goals in Latin America and assess the outcomes they extracted from this relationship. We draw evidence from and offer comparisons across different presidencies in each country (Lula and Rousseff in Brazil, and Fox, Calderón, and Peña Nieto in Mexico) over the 2000s, which allows us to grasp the variation in ideology, governance style, and electoral legitimacy. We ground our theoretical framework in the concept of international insertion, a Southern-based framework that opens space to understand and explain how countries in the South behave in international politics from a different point of view. We claim that the efforts made by the national governments in both countries to improve their positions achieved limited or transitory results, if considering China as a strategic factor.","PeriodicalId":44280,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Political Studies-EPS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missing the China factor: evidence from Brazil and Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Marco Cepik, Fabrício H. Chagas-Bastos, Rafael R. Ioris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract China’s rapid economic growth created new challenges and opportunities for Latin America over the 2000s. Much ink has been spilt analysing how countries in the region surfed the Chinese wave of commodity-based prosperity. However, there is fertile and quite unexplored territory to analyse how these regional powers in the Global South, from a comparative perspective, have interacted with China as they tried to improve their international position over the 2000s. We analyse in this article how Brazil and Mexico dealt with China’s presence and strategic goals in Latin America and assess the outcomes they extracted from this relationship. We draw evidence from and offer comparisons across different presidencies in each country (Lula and Rousseff in Brazil, and Fox, Calderón, and Peña Nieto in Mexico) over the 2000s, which allows us to grasp the variation in ideology, governance style, and electoral legitimacy. We ground our theoretical framework in the concept of international insertion, a Southern-based framework that opens space to understand and explain how countries in the South behave in international politics from a different point of view. We claim that the efforts made by the national governments in both countries to improve their positions achieved limited or transitory results, if considering China as a strategic factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic and Political Studies-EPS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic and Political Studies-EPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Political Studies-EPS","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2000年代以来,中国经济的快速增长为拉丁美洲带来了新的挑战和机遇。人们花了很多笔墨来分析亚洲各国是如何在中国掀起的大宗商品繁荣浪潮中乘风破浪的。然而,从比较的角度来看,全球南方的这些地区大国在本世纪头十年试图改善其国际地位的过程中,是如何与中国互动的,这是一个丰富而尚未开发的领域。本文分析了巴西和墨西哥如何应对中国在拉丁美洲的存在和战略目标,并评估了他们从这种关系中提取的结果。我们从2000年代以来每个国家的不同总统(巴西的卢拉和罗塞夫,墨西哥的福克斯、Calderón和Peña涅托)中提取证据并进行比较,这使我们能够掌握意识形态、治理风格和选举合法性的变化。我们的理论框架以国际插入的概念为基础,这是一个以南方为基础的框架,为从不同的角度理解和解释南方国家在国际政治中的行为开辟了空间。我们认为,如果把中国作为一个战略因素来考虑的话,两国政府为改善自身地位所做的努力取得了有限的或暂时的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Missing the China factor: evidence from Brazil and Mexico
Abstract China’s rapid economic growth created new challenges and opportunities for Latin America over the 2000s. Much ink has been spilt analysing how countries in the region surfed the Chinese wave of commodity-based prosperity. However, there is fertile and quite unexplored territory to analyse how these regional powers in the Global South, from a comparative perspective, have interacted with China as they tried to improve their international position over the 2000s. We analyse in this article how Brazil and Mexico dealt with China’s presence and strategic goals in Latin America and assess the outcomes they extracted from this relationship. We draw evidence from and offer comparisons across different presidencies in each country (Lula and Rousseff in Brazil, and Fox, Calderón, and Peña Nieto in Mexico) over the 2000s, which allows us to grasp the variation in ideology, governance style, and electoral legitimacy. We ground our theoretical framework in the concept of international insertion, a Southern-based framework that opens space to understand and explain how countries in the South behave in international politics from a different point of view. We claim that the efforts made by the national governments in both countries to improve their positions achieved limited or transitory results, if considering China as a strategic factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Political Studies-EPS
Economic and Political Studies-EPS SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信