确定景观建筑项目质量评估的关键标准

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Architecture and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2478/aup-2020-0002

Gintaras Stauskis

{"title":"确定景观建筑项目质量评估的关键标准","authors":"Gintaras Stauskis","doi":"10.2478/aup-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract the question of quality of modified landscape is critical for the client and the users and depends on the quality of projects. After theoretical and empirical research, the paper proposes the framework for quality assessment criteria and corresponding indicators for assessing landscape architecture projects. By thorough analysis of the recent international research and design and implementation practices in Lithuania, the paper gives the flexible and universal set of environmental, socio-economic, and aesthetic quality criteria and relevant indicators in the context of sustainable performance.","PeriodicalId":36267,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects\",\"authors\":\"Gintaras Stauskis\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aup-2020-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract the question of quality of modified landscape is critical for the client and the users and depends on the quality of projects. After theoretical and empirical research, the paper proposes the framework for quality assessment criteria and corresponding indicators for assessing landscape architecture projects. By thorough analysis of the recent international research and design and implementation practices in Lithuania, the paper gives the flexible and universal set of environmental, socio-economic, and aesthetic quality criteria and relevant indicators in the context of sustainable performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要改造景观的质量问题对业主和使用者来说都是至关重要的，它取决于项目的质量。通过理论和实证研究，提出了景观项目质量评价标准框架和相应的评价指标。通过对最近在立陶宛进行的国际研究、设计和实施实践的深入分析，本文给出了一套灵活而通用的环境、社会经济和美学质量标准以及可持续绩效背景下的相关指标。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects

Abstract the question of quality of modified landscape is critical for the client and the users and depends on the quality of projects. After theoretical and empirical research, the paper proposes the framework for quality assessment criteria and corresponding indicators for assessing landscape architecture projects. By thorough analysis of the recent international research and design and implementation practices in Lithuania, the paper gives the flexible and universal set of environmental, socio-economic, and aesthetic quality criteria and relevant indicators in the context of sustainable performance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Architecture and Urban Planning Arts and Humanities-Conservation

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量