从内部看:从监狱系统官员,官员和工作人员对限制性住房的见解

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
D. Mears, George B. Pesta, Vivian Aranda-Hughes
{"title":"从内部看:从监狱系统官员,官员和工作人员对限制性住房的见解","authors":"D. Mears, George B. Pesta, Vivian Aranda-Hughes","doi":"10.1177/00328855211060308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restrictive housing substantially limits inmate movement and privileges. Proponents argue it creates safer prison systems, while opponents claim it does not and harms inmates. However, few studies have systematically examined restrictive housing through the perspective of those who work in prison systems or scrutinized the diverse dimensions relevant to its appraisal. This study addresses this gap by drawing on qualitative data to examine how such individuals view the housing, its operational challenges, effectiveness, possible improvements, and potential alternatives. We present findings along each of these dimensions and then discuss their implications for research and policy.","PeriodicalId":47409,"journal":{"name":"Prison Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views From the Inside: Insights About Restrictive Housing From Prison System Officials, Officers, and Staff\",\"authors\":\"D. Mears, George B. Pesta, Vivian Aranda-Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00328855211060308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Restrictive housing substantially limits inmate movement and privileges. Proponents argue it creates safer prison systems, while opponents claim it does not and harms inmates. However, few studies have systematically examined restrictive housing through the perspective of those who work in prison systems or scrutinized the diverse dimensions relevant to its appraisal. This study addresses this gap by drawing on qualitative data to examine how such individuals view the housing, its operational challenges, effectiveness, possible improvements, and potential alternatives. We present findings along each of these dimensions and then discuss their implications for research and policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prison Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prison Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211060308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prison Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211060308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

限制性住房在很大程度上限制了囚犯的行动和特权。支持者认为它创造了更安全的监狱系统,而反对者则声称它没有,并伤害了囚犯。然而,很少有研究从监狱系统工作人员的角度系统地审查限制性住房,或仔细审查与评估相关的不同层面。这项研究通过利用定性数据来研究这些人如何看待住房、其运营挑战、有效性、可能的改进和潜在的替代方案,从而解决了这一差距。我们从每一个方面介绍研究结果,然后讨论它们对研究和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Views From the Inside: Insights About Restrictive Housing From Prison System Officials, Officers, and Staff
Restrictive housing substantially limits inmate movement and privileges. Proponents argue it creates safer prison systems, while opponents claim it does not and harms inmates. However, few studies have systematically examined restrictive housing through the perspective of those who work in prison systems or scrutinized the diverse dimensions relevant to its appraisal. This study addresses this gap by drawing on qualitative data to examine how such individuals view the housing, its operational challenges, effectiveness, possible improvements, and potential alternatives. We present findings along each of these dimensions and then discuss their implications for research and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prison Journal
Prison Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The editorial team"s aim is to establish The Prison Journal as a focal point and the forum of choice for studies, ideas, and discussion of adult and juvenile confinement, treatment interventions, and alternative sanctions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信