一个难以忽视的真相:运输成本不对称减少带来的福利损失

IF 0.9 Q3 ECONOMICS
Wisarut Suwanprasert
{"title":"一个难以忽视的真相:运输成本不对称减少带来的福利损失","authors":"Wisarut Suwanprasert","doi":"10.1080/10168737.2023.2169868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent empirical studies find that the magnitudes of reductions in bilateral shipping costs are asymmetric within country pairs. Motivated by these findings, I study the welfare effects of asymmetric reductions in transportation costs in Helpman and Itskhoki's [(2010). Labour market rigidities, trade and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 77(3), 1100–1137] model of international trade with heterogeneous firms and frictional labor markets. I show that sufficiently asymmetric reductions in bilateral transportation costs result in welfare losses in the importing country, while a uniform reduction in the bilateral transportation costs of both imports and exports always benefits both countries. This paper raises a cautionary note that the phrase ‘welfare gains from trade liberalization’ implicitly assumes an ‘approximately equal’ reduction in transportation costs.","PeriodicalId":35933,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Inconvenient Truth: Welfare Losses From Asymmetric Reductions in Transportation Costs\",\"authors\":\"Wisarut Suwanprasert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10168737.2023.2169868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent empirical studies find that the magnitudes of reductions in bilateral shipping costs are asymmetric within country pairs. Motivated by these findings, I study the welfare effects of asymmetric reductions in transportation costs in Helpman and Itskhoki's [(2010). Labour market rigidities, trade and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 77(3), 1100–1137] model of international trade with heterogeneous firms and frictional labor markets. I show that sufficiently asymmetric reductions in bilateral transportation costs result in welfare losses in the importing country, while a uniform reduction in the bilateral transportation costs of both imports and exports always benefits both countries. This paper raises a cautionary note that the phrase ‘welfare gains from trade liberalization’ implicitly assumes an ‘approximately equal’ reduction in transportation costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2023.2169868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2023.2169868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的实证研究发现,双边运输成本的下降幅度在国家对内是不对称的。受这些发现的启发,我在Helpman和Itskhoki的[(2010)。劳动力市场刚性、贸易和失业。经济研究综述,77(3),1100–1137]中研究了运输成本不对称降低的福利效应。异质企业和摩擦劳动力市场的国际贸易模型。我表明,双边运输成本的充分不对称减少会导致进口国的福利损失,而进口和出口的双边运输成本统一减少总是对两国都有利。本文提出了一个警告,即“贸易自由化带来的福利收益”一词隐含地假设运输成本“大致相等”地降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Inconvenient Truth: Welfare Losses From Asymmetric Reductions in Transportation Costs
Recent empirical studies find that the magnitudes of reductions in bilateral shipping costs are asymmetric within country pairs. Motivated by these findings, I study the welfare effects of asymmetric reductions in transportation costs in Helpman and Itskhoki's [(2010). Labour market rigidities, trade and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 77(3), 1100–1137] model of international trade with heterogeneous firms and frictional labor markets. I show that sufficiently asymmetric reductions in bilateral transportation costs result in welfare losses in the importing country, while a uniform reduction in the bilateral transportation costs of both imports and exports always benefits both countries. This paper raises a cautionary note that the phrase ‘welfare gains from trade liberalization’ implicitly assumes an ‘approximately equal’ reduction in transportation costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: International Economic Journal is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to publishing high-quality papers and sharing original economics research worldwide. We invite theoretical and empirical papers in the broadly-defined development and international economics areas. Papers in other sub-disciplines of economics (e.g., labor, public, money, macro, industrial organizations, health, environment and history) are also welcome if they contain international or cross-national dimensions in their scope and/or implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信