志同道合的吗?瑞士-欧盟关系中政治精英与选民在政策选择上的一致性

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
L. Lauener
{"title":"志同道合的吗?瑞士-欧盟关系中政治精英与选民在政策选择上的一致性","authors":"L. Lauener","doi":"10.1111/spsr.12531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Swiss- EU relations not only rank among the most important political problems for citizens but are also the subject of repeated political contestation. Using data from the 2019 Swiss Election Study (Selects), this article examines the extent to which the opinions of political elites and voters coincide on four European integration issues: 1) the trade- off between maintaining the bilateral agreements and limiting immigration, 2) the cohesion billion, 3) the trade- off between the institutional framework agreement and the accompanying measures, and 4) EU membership. The results show that, overall, candidates represent voters extremely well with regard to positions , i.e., both groups are “on the same side”. However, candidates are generally more EU- integrationist and hold more extreme opinions than voters. Moreover, this article investigates how well candidates represent the variety of voter opinions and finds that – contrary to previous research – there is no systematic difference between centrist and pole parties.","PeriodicalId":46785,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Likeminded? Congruence Between Political Elites and their Voters Regarding Policy Choices in\\n Swiss‐EU\\n Relations\",\"authors\":\"L. Lauener\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spsr.12531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Swiss- EU relations not only rank among the most important political problems for citizens but are also the subject of repeated political contestation. Using data from the 2019 Swiss Election Study (Selects), this article examines the extent to which the opinions of political elites and voters coincide on four European integration issues: 1) the trade- off between maintaining the bilateral agreements and limiting immigration, 2) the cohesion billion, 3) the trade- off between the institutional framework agreement and the accompanying measures, and 4) EU membership. The results show that, overall, candidates represent voters extremely well with regard to positions , i.e., both groups are “on the same side”. However, candidates are generally more EU- integrationist and hold more extreme opinions than voters. Moreover, this article investigates how well candidates represent the variety of voter opinions and finds that – contrary to previous research – there is no systematic difference between centrist and pole parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12531\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞士与欧盟的关系不仅是公民最重要的政治问题之一,也是反复出现的政治争论的主题。本文利用2019年瑞士选举研究(Selects)的数据,考察了政治精英和选民在四个欧洲一体化问题上的意见一致程度:1)维持双边协议与限制移民之间的权衡,2)凝聚力十亿,3)制度框架协议与配套措施之间的权衡,以及4)欧盟成员国身份。结果表明,总的来说,候选人在立场上非常好地代表了选民,也就是说,两个群体都“站在同一边”。然而,候选人通常更倾向于欧盟一体化,并持有比选民更极端的观点。此外,本文还调查了候选人在多大程度上代表了选民的各种观点,并发现——与之前的研究相反——中间派和极派政党之间没有系统的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Likeminded? Congruence Between Political Elites and their Voters Regarding Policy Choices in Swiss‐EU Relations
Swiss- EU relations not only rank among the most important political problems for citizens but are also the subject of repeated political contestation. Using data from the 2019 Swiss Election Study (Selects), this article examines the extent to which the opinions of political elites and voters coincide on four European integration issues: 1) the trade- off between maintaining the bilateral agreements and limiting immigration, 2) the cohesion billion, 3) the trade- off between the institutional framework agreement and the accompanying measures, and 4) EU membership. The results show that, overall, candidates represent voters extremely well with regard to positions , i.e., both groups are “on the same side”. However, candidates are generally more EU- integrationist and hold more extreme opinions than voters. Moreover, this article investigates how well candidates represent the variety of voter opinions and finds that – contrary to previous research – there is no systematic difference between centrist and pole parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Political Science Review
Swiss Political Science Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信