罗曼史中的不定式亲属:截断与干预辩论的结果

IF 0.7 2区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research Pub Date : 2019-08-14 DOI:10.1111/SYNT.12183

Xavier Villalba

{"title":"罗曼史中的不定式亲属:截断与干预辩论的结果","authors":"Xavier Villalba","doi":"10.1111/SYNT.12183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Romance clitic left dislocation is widespread across all kinds of nonroot contexts, but it is forbidden in inﬁnitive wh -relatives. This article investigates the extent and nature of this restriction and the consequences it raises for the truncation and intervention analyses of the left periphery of embedded sentences. We will show that current proposals cannot account for the whole gamut of data. In consequence, we will propose that inﬁnitive wh -relatives display a maximally syncretic left periphery, whereas inﬁnitive wh -interrogatives have a full-ﬂedged left periphery, crucially involving ForceP, because they are selected by a higher predicate. This crucial difference between inﬁnitive relatives and interrogatives will also be shown to be consistent with the existence of specialized complementizers for the former but not the latter.","PeriodicalId":45823,"journal":{"name":"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/SYNT.12183","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"InfinitiveWh‐Relatives in Romance: Consequences for the Truncation‐versus‐Intervention Debate\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Villalba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/SYNT.12183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Romance clitic left dislocation is widespread across all kinds of nonroot contexts, but it is forbidden in inﬁnitive wh -relatives. This article investigates the extent and nature of this restriction and the consequences it raises for the truncation and intervention analyses of the left periphery of embedded sentences. We will show that current proposals cannot account for the whole gamut of data. In consequence, we will propose that inﬁnitive wh -relatives display a maximally syncretic left periphery, whereas inﬁnitive wh -interrogatives have a full-ﬂedged left periphery, crucially involving ForceP, because they are selected by a higher predicate. This crucial difference between inﬁnitive relatives and interrogatives will also be shown to be consistent with the existence of specialized complementizers for the former but not the latter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/SYNT.12183\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/SYNT.12183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/SYNT.12183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

浪漫主义派系左错位在各种非词根语境中都很普遍，但在限定的wh-亲属中是被禁止的。本文探讨了这种限制的范围和性质，以及它对嵌入句左边缘的截断和干预分析所带来的后果。我们将表明，目前的提案无法涵盖所有数据。因此，我们将提出，在限定的wh-亲属中显示出最大程度的左边缘融合，而在限定的wh-疑问句中显示出全边缘的左边缘，关键是涉及ForceP，因为它们是由更高的谓词选择的。定义亲属和疑问句之间的这种关键差异也将被证明与前者存在专门的补充语一致，但后者不存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

InfinitiveWh‐Relatives in Romance: Consequences for the Truncation‐versus‐Intervention Debate

. Romance clitic left dislocation is widespread across all kinds of nonroot contexts, but it is forbidden in inﬁnitive wh -relatives. This article investigates the extent and nature of this restriction and the consequences it raises for the truncation and intervention analyses of the left periphery of embedded sentences. We will show that current proposals cannot account for the whole gamut of data. In consequence, we will propose that inﬁnitive wh -relatives display a maximally syncretic left periphery, whereas inﬁnitive wh -interrogatives have a full-ﬂedged left periphery, crucially involving ForceP, because they are selected by a higher predicate. This crucial difference between inﬁnitive relatives and interrogatives will also be shown to be consistent with the existence of specialized complementizers for the former but not the latter.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research Multiple-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Syntax publishes a wide range of articles on the syntax of natural languages and closely related fields. The journal promotes work on formal syntactic theory and theoretically-oriented descriptive work on particular languages and comparative grammar. Syntax also publishes research on the interfaces between syntax and related fields such as semantics, morphology, and phonology, as well as theoretical and experimental studies in sentence processing, language acquisition, and other areas of psycholinguistics that bear on syntactic theories. In addition to full length research articles, Syntax features short articles which facilitate a fast review process. ''In the few years of its existence, Syntax quickly became one of the most prominent journals in the field, and unique as a source for high-quality studies at the forefront of research, combining theoretical inquiry and often significant innovation with outstanding descriptive and experimental work. It is indispensable for researchers in the areas it covers.'' Noam Chomsky, Massachusets Institute of Technology, USA