Q3 Dentistry
Cihan Hasçi̇zmeci̇, Burak Buldur
{"title":"FARKLI İRRİGASYON SİSTEMLERİNİN KANAL İÇİ İLAÇLARIN UZAKLAŞTIRILMASINA ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ","authors":"Cihan Hasçi̇zmeci̇, Burak Buldur","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1237798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different irrigation systems on the removal of intracanal medicament used in regenerative endodonti treatment. \nMaterials and Methods: Following standardized preparation to obtain an immature tooth model, modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) consisting of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and clindamycin was applied to the root canals of single-rooted human maxillar teeth and waited for three weeks. A total of 50 teeth with standardized preparation and intracanal medicament were randomly divided into five groups according to the irrigation method to be applied (n=10); Group 1: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Group 2: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), Group 3: EndoActivator (EA), Group 4: EndoVac (EV) Group 5: Nd:YAG laser (LSR). Following the removal of the mTAP with different irrigation systems, the teeth were divided along their bukko-lingual axis. The impact roots were examined under the stereomicroscope with the 4-grade scoring scale for the presence of residual intracanal medicaments. Scores for coronal, middle and apical regions of each root were recorded. \nResults: In terms of total scores, PUI group showed higher intracanal medicament removal efficacy compared to the other groups (p","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1237798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价再生牙髓治疗中不同灌洗系统对管内药物清除的影响。材料与方法:标准化制备未成熟牙模型后,将甲硝唑、环丙沙星、克林霉素组成的改良三抗生素糊剂(mTAP)应用于单根人上颌牙根管,等待3周。50颗牙经标准化准备并经管内给药,按冲洗方式随机分为5组(n=10);1组:常规注射器灌洗(CSI), 2组:被动超声灌洗(PUI), 3组:EndoActivator (EA), 4组:EndoVac (EV), 5组:Nd:YAG激光(LSR)。用不同的冲洗系统去除mTAP后,沿其颊舌轴将牙齿分开。在体视显微镜下检查冲击根,用4级评分量表检查是否存在残留的管内药物。记录每根冠状区、中区和根尖区的评分。结果:从总分上看,PUI组肛管内药物清除效果明显高于其他组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FARKLI İRRİGASYON SİSTEMLERİNİN KANAL İÇİ İLAÇLARIN UZAKLAŞTIRILMASINA ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different irrigation systems on the removal of intracanal medicament used in regenerative endodonti treatment. Materials and Methods: Following standardized preparation to obtain an immature tooth model, modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) consisting of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and clindamycin was applied to the root canals of single-rooted human maxillar teeth and waited for three weeks. A total of 50 teeth with standardized preparation and intracanal medicament were randomly divided into five groups according to the irrigation method to be applied (n=10); Group 1: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Group 2: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), Group 3: EndoActivator (EA), Group 4: EndoVac (EV) Group 5: Nd:YAG laser (LSR). Following the removal of the mTAP with different irrigation systems, the teeth were divided along their bukko-lingual axis. The impact roots were examined under the stereomicroscope with the 4-grade scoring scale for the presence of residual intracanal medicaments. Scores for coronal, middle and apical regions of each root were recorded. Results: In terms of total scores, PUI group showed higher intracanal medicament removal efficacy compared to the other groups (p
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信