S. Amoueian, A. Attaranzadeh, Mahdi Montazer, Arash Akhavan Rezayat, Amir Behforouz, Fatemeh Sobhani
{"title":"显色原位杂交(CISH)与免疫组化(IHC)方法扩增癌症HER-2/neu基因的比较","authors":"S. Amoueian, A. Attaranzadeh, Mahdi Montazer, Arash Akhavan Rezayat, Amir Behforouz, Fatemeh Sobhani","doi":"10.5812/RIJM.13397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric cancer has a high mortality rate and often has a poor treatment outcome. The HER2/neu gene target therapy has been known as a potential way for treatment. Objectives: The goal of our study was assessment the relation between chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods in determining the best diagnostic method for gastric cancer. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 50 gastric cancer samples were analyzed by CISH and IHC. The relation between clinical-pathological parameters of HER2/neu was also analyzed. Alive patients were followed from 2009 through 2012 for the main out-comes (mortality). The results of these two methods, in terms of sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarcinoma cells and patient survival rates were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between IHC and CISH regarding the sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarci-nomacellsandpatientsurvivalrates. Comparisonof TNMscoresbythesetwomethodsshowednosignificantrelationshipbetween IHC and staging, but a statistically significant difference between CISH and different N staging, (P < 0.05) was assessed. Conclusions: Comparison between IHC and CISH showed the only significant relationship between CISH and different N staging. Therefore, low amplified CISH was a better diagnostic method for gastric cancer, compared to low expression in IHC.","PeriodicalId":20994,"journal":{"name":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment the of Amplification HER-2/neu Gene by Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Compared to Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Method in Gastric Cancer\",\"authors\":\"S. Amoueian, A. Attaranzadeh, Mahdi Montazer, Arash Akhavan Rezayat, Amir Behforouz, Fatemeh Sobhani\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/RIJM.13397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gastric cancer has a high mortality rate and often has a poor treatment outcome. The HER2/neu gene target therapy has been known as a potential way for treatment. Objectives: The goal of our study was assessment the relation between chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods in determining the best diagnostic method for gastric cancer. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 50 gastric cancer samples were analyzed by CISH and IHC. The relation between clinical-pathological parameters of HER2/neu was also analyzed. Alive patients were followed from 2009 through 2012 for the main out-comes (mortality). The results of these two methods, in terms of sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarcinoma cells and patient survival rates were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between IHC and CISH regarding the sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarci-nomacellsandpatientsurvivalrates. Comparisonof TNMscoresbythesetwomethodsshowednosignificantrelationshipbetween IHC and staging, but a statistically significant difference between CISH and different N staging, (P < 0.05) was assessed. Conclusions: Comparison between IHC and CISH showed the only significant relationship between CISH and different N staging. Therefore, low amplified CISH was a better diagnostic method for gastric cancer, compared to low expression in IHC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Razavi International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Razavi International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/RIJM.13397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/RIJM.13397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment the of Amplification HER-2/neu Gene by Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) Compared to Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Method in Gastric Cancer
Background: Gastric cancer has a high mortality rate and often has a poor treatment outcome. The HER2/neu gene target therapy has been known as a potential way for treatment. Objectives: The goal of our study was assessment the relation between chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods in determining the best diagnostic method for gastric cancer. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 50 gastric cancer samples were analyzed by CISH and IHC. The relation between clinical-pathological parameters of HER2/neu was also analyzed. Alive patients were followed from 2009 through 2012 for the main out-comes (mortality). The results of these two methods, in terms of sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarcinoma cells and patient survival rates were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between IHC and CISH regarding the sex, age, tumor size, grading, staging, tumor location, metaplasia, presence of necrosis and ulceration, vascular invasion, the TNM system, mucin or signet producing adenocarci-nomacellsandpatientsurvivalrates. Comparisonof TNMscoresbythesetwomethodsshowednosignificantrelationshipbetween IHC and staging, but a statistically significant difference between CISH and different N staging, (P < 0.05) was assessed. Conclusions: Comparison between IHC and CISH showed the only significant relationship between CISH and different N staging. Therefore, low amplified CISH was a better diagnostic method for gastric cancer, compared to low expression in IHC.
期刊介绍:
The Razavi International Journal of Medicine aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and medical sciences. The Razavi International Journal of Medicine is an international, English language, peer-reviewed, open access, free access journal dealing with general Medicine and medical sciences, clinical and basic studies, public health, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the education and research department, Razavi Hospital and is published quarterly.