基于人权限制原则的刑事定罪

Mahrus Ali, Irwan Hafid, Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny
{"title":"基于人权限制原则的刑事定罪","authors":"Mahrus Ali, Irwan Hafid, Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny","doi":"10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to The Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizen s’ civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights. Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation\",\"authors\":\"Mahrus Ali, Irwan Hafid, Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny\",\"doi\":\"10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction to The Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizen s’ civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights. Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Novelty\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Novelty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题简介:使用刑法来限制公民公民权利的自由必须谨慎,因为它与侵犯公民权利密切相关。目的/目的研究:本研究旨在探讨基于人权限制原则的刑事定罪标准。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用了理论法律研究,同时使用了概念和法定方法。研究结果:在非法行为的政策制定中,立法者经常制定权利约束。人权限制规定的刑事定罪标准可用于适用这一限制。立法机构确定的限制犯罪必须是法律、合法目的和民主社会的必要性。民主社会要求的标准不存在一致的模式。最后一项标准与人权中的相称性原则和作为最后手段的刑法概念都有联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation
Introduction to The Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizen s’ civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights. Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信