教学增加了加拿大学生对横向阅读策略的偏好和使用,以核实在线信息的事实

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jessica E. Brodsky, P. J. Brooks, Dimitrios Pavlounis, Jessica Leigh Johnston
{"title":"教学增加了加拿大学生对横向阅读策略的偏好和使用,以核实在线信息的事实","authors":"Jessica E. Brodsky, P. J. Brooks, Dimitrios Pavlounis, Jessica Leigh Johnston","doi":"10.1177/23328584231192106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian middle and high school students (N = 2,278) completed a “CTRL-F” curriculum teaching them how to evaluate online information by reading laterally to investigate sources, check claims, and trace information to original contexts. A subset of CTRL-F students (N = 316) were in classes with teacher-matched control groups (N = 287). Some CTRL-F students (N = 994) completed a delayed posttest. At pretest, students indicated preference for some lateral reading strategies, but preference rarely translated into use. Following instruction, CTRL-F students showed greater preference for and use of lateral reading than controls and greater alignment between preference and use. The curriculum’s impact varied by demographic factors but not by differences in implementation. Gains were maintained from posttest to delayed posttest. Direct instruction and practice in lateral reading appear to strengthen connections between students’ preferences and utilization of these strategies to evaluate online content relevant to academic and personal life.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruction Increases Canadian Students’ Preference for and Use of Lateral Reading Strategies to Fact-Check Online Information\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E. Brodsky, P. J. Brooks, Dimitrios Pavlounis, Jessica Leigh Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23328584231192106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canadian middle and high school students (N = 2,278) completed a “CTRL-F” curriculum teaching them how to evaluate online information by reading laterally to investigate sources, check claims, and trace information to original contexts. A subset of CTRL-F students (N = 316) were in classes with teacher-matched control groups (N = 287). Some CTRL-F students (N = 994) completed a delayed posttest. At pretest, students indicated preference for some lateral reading strategies, but preference rarely translated into use. Following instruction, CTRL-F students showed greater preference for and use of lateral reading than controls and greater alignment between preference and use. The curriculum’s impact varied by demographic factors but not by differences in implementation. Gains were maintained from posttest to delayed posttest. Direct instruction and practice in lateral reading appear to strengthen connections between students’ preferences and utilization of these strategies to evaluate online content relevant to academic and personal life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aera Open\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aera Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231192106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231192106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

加拿大的初高中学生(N = 2278)完成了一个“CTRL-F”课程,教他们如何通过横向阅读来评估在线信息,调查来源,检查声明,并将信息追溯到原始语境。按ctrl键的学生子集(N = 316)与教师匹配的对照组(N = 287)在同一班级。一些按CTRL-F键的学生(N = 994)完成了延迟后测。在测试前,学生表现出对一些横向阅读策略的偏好,但这种偏好很少转化为使用。在指导下,按CTRL-F键的学生比控制组更喜欢和使用横向阅读,并且偏好和使用之间更一致。课程的影响因人口因素而异,但不受实施方式差异的影响。从后测到延迟后测,收益保持不变。横向阅读的直接指导和实践似乎加强了学生对这些策略的偏好和利用之间的联系,以评估与学术和个人生活相关的在线内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruction Increases Canadian Students’ Preference for and Use of Lateral Reading Strategies to Fact-Check Online Information
Canadian middle and high school students (N = 2,278) completed a “CTRL-F” curriculum teaching them how to evaluate online information by reading laterally to investigate sources, check claims, and trace information to original contexts. A subset of CTRL-F students (N = 316) were in classes with teacher-matched control groups (N = 287). Some CTRL-F students (N = 994) completed a delayed posttest. At pretest, students indicated preference for some lateral reading strategies, but preference rarely translated into use. Following instruction, CTRL-F students showed greater preference for and use of lateral reading than controls and greater alignment between preference and use. The curriculum’s impact varied by demographic factors but not by differences in implementation. Gains were maintained from posttest to delayed posttest. Direct instruction and practice in lateral reading appear to strengthen connections between students’ preferences and utilization of these strategies to evaluate online content relevant to academic and personal life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信