教育-吸烟梯度与上游健康政策:X一代与千禧一代的比较

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M. Dilmaghani
{"title":"教育-吸烟梯度与上游健康政策:X一代与千禧一代的比较","authors":"M. Dilmaghani","doi":"10.1108/HE-02-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOver the years, many upstream health policies have sought to reduce smoking across populations. While smoking has been substantially reduced, the effects of these policies on education-smoking gradient remain unclear. The present paper compares the education-smoking gradient among the Generation X and the millennials, who grew up with different types of upstream policies.Design/methodology/approachThe study relies on regression analysis. The data are from the Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey of 2017, with the sample restricted to those born between 1965 and 1995.FindingsAt the zero-order, the education-smoking gradient has not significantly flattened from Generation X to millennials. And, accounting for the channels of impact of education on smoking does not substantially change this pattern.Social implicationsThe implications for health inequalities associated with socioeconomic status, and tobacco consumption reduction policies, are discussed.Originality/valueThis paper is the first study of the kind using Canadian data.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education-smoking gradient and upstream health policies: comparing Generation X with millennials\",\"authors\":\"M. Dilmaghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HE-02-2021-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeOver the years, many upstream health policies have sought to reduce smoking across populations. While smoking has been substantially reduced, the effects of these policies on education-smoking gradient remain unclear. The present paper compares the education-smoking gradient among the Generation X and the millennials, who grew up with different types of upstream policies.Design/methodology/approachThe study relies on regression analysis. The data are from the Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey of 2017, with the sample restricted to those born between 1965 and 1995.FindingsAt the zero-order, the education-smoking gradient has not significantly flattened from Generation X to millennials. And, accounting for the channels of impact of education on smoking does not substantially change this pattern.Social implicationsThe implications for health inequalities associated with socioeconomic status, and tobacco consumption reduction policies, are discussed.Originality/valueThis paper is the first study of the kind using Canadian data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-02-2021-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-02-2021-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的多年来,许多上游卫生政策都在寻求减少人群吸烟。虽然吸烟率已大幅下降,但这些政策对教育吸烟梯度的影响尚不清楚。本文比较了在不同类型的上游政策下长大的X一代和千禧一代的教育吸烟梯度。设计/方法论/方法该研究依赖于回归分析。数据来自2017年的加拿大烟草、酒精和毒品调查,样本仅限于1965年至1995年间出生的人。结果显示,从X一代到千禧一代,教育吸烟梯度并没有显著降低。而且,考虑到教育对吸烟的影响渠道并没有实质性地改变这种模式。社会影响讨论了与社会经济地位和减少烟草消费政策相关的健康不平等的影响。原创性/价值本文是首次使用加拿大数据进行此类研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education-smoking gradient and upstream health policies: comparing Generation X with millennials
PurposeOver the years, many upstream health policies have sought to reduce smoking across populations. While smoking has been substantially reduced, the effects of these policies on education-smoking gradient remain unclear. The present paper compares the education-smoking gradient among the Generation X and the millennials, who grew up with different types of upstream policies.Design/methodology/approachThe study relies on regression analysis. The data are from the Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey of 2017, with the sample restricted to those born between 1965 and 1995.FindingsAt the zero-order, the education-smoking gradient has not significantly flattened from Generation X to millennials. And, accounting for the channels of impact of education on smoking does not substantially change this pattern.Social implicationsThe implications for health inequalities associated with socioeconomic status, and tobacco consumption reduction policies, are discussed.Originality/valueThis paper is the first study of the kind using Canadian data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信