对沃尔什和奥普雷的回应和评论

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
K. Dowding
{"title":"对沃尔什和奥普雷的回应和评论","authors":"K. Dowding","doi":"10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The danger in debates across disciplines is talking past one another. Each taking for granted different aspects and misinterpreting claims. Walsh’s three theses are all acceptable to me under a spe...","PeriodicalId":46913,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Political Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"466 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response and comments on Walsh and Oprea\",\"authors\":\"K. Dowding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The danger in debates across disciplines is talking past one another. Each taking for granted different aspects and misinterpreting claims. Walsh’s three theses are all acceptable to me under a spe...\",\"PeriodicalId\":46913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"466 - 468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨学科辩论的危险在于相互回避。每个人都认为不同的方面是理所当然的,并误解了说法。沃尔什的三篇论文都是我可以接受的。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response and comments on Walsh and Oprea
The danger in debates across disciplines is talking past one another. Each taking for granted different aspects and misinterpreting claims. Walsh’s three theses are all acceptable to me under a spe...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Political Science is the official journal of the Australian Political Studies Association. The editorial team of the Journal includes a range of Australian and overseas specialists covering the major subdisciplines of political science. We publish articles of high quality at the cutting edge of the discipline, characterised by conceptual clarity, methodological rigour, substantive interest, theoretical coherence, broad appeal, originality and insight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信