聚丙烯补片腹腔镜腹疝修补术的文献回顾

Q4 Medicine
Elmutaz A. M. Kanani
{"title":"聚丙烯补片腹腔镜腹疝修补术的文献回顾","authors":"Elmutaz A. M. Kanani","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is currently considered the gold standard. However, the mesh selection is still controversial. The aim of this review is to look for evidence that supports the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM) in the intraperitoneal position in LVHR. Materials and methods: The literature was searched systematically using Google Scholar and PubMed for controlled studies, prospective descriptive series, and retrospective case series. Results: A total of 11 studies were retrieved. All the studies were either retrospective or animal experiments. Their outcomes are heterogeneous and they have multiple weaknesses. Conclusion: The literature clearly lacks data from controlled randomized trials in humans that can give strong evidence. The use of intraperitoneal PPM in LVHR remains an individual surgeon preference decision until well-designed prospective double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials are available.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair with Polypropylene Mesh: A Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Elmutaz A. M. Kanani\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is currently considered the gold standard. However, the mesh selection is still controversial. The aim of this review is to look for evidence that supports the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM) in the intraperitoneal position in LVHR. Materials and methods: The literature was searched systematically using Google Scholar and PubMed for controlled studies, prospective descriptive series, and retrospective case series. Results: A total of 11 studies were retrieved. All the studies were either retrospective or animal experiments. Their outcomes are heterogeneous and they have multiple weaknesses. Conclusion: The literature clearly lacks data from controlled randomized trials in humans that can give strong evidence. The use of intraperitoneal PPM in LVHR remains an individual surgeon preference decision until well-designed prospective double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)目前被认为是黄金标准。但是,网格选择仍然存在争议。本综述的目的是寻找支持在LVHR腹膜内位置使用聚丙烯网(PPM)的证据。材料和方法:使用Google Scholar和PubMed系统检索文献,包括对照研究、前瞻性描述性系列和回顾性病例系列。结果:共检索到11项研究。所有的研究都是回顾性的或动物实验。他们的结果是不同的,他们有多个弱点。结论:文献中明显缺乏能够提供有力证据的人类随机对照试验的数据。在设计良好的前瞻性双盲随机对照临床试验可用之前,在LVHR中使用腹膜内PPM仍然是个体外科医生的偏好决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair with Polypropylene Mesh: A Literature Review
Background: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is currently considered the gold standard. However, the mesh selection is still controversial. The aim of this review is to look for evidence that supports the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM) in the intraperitoneal position in LVHR. Materials and methods: The literature was searched systematically using Google Scholar and PubMed for controlled studies, prospective descriptive series, and retrospective case series. Results: A total of 11 studies were retrieved. All the studies were either retrospective or animal experiments. Their outcomes are heterogeneous and they have multiple weaknesses. Conclusion: The literature clearly lacks data from controlled randomized trials in humans that can give strong evidence. The use of intraperitoneal PPM in LVHR remains an individual surgeon preference decision until well-designed prospective double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信