在管理人员的指导计划中绘制被指导者的结果

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Nuria Gisbert-Trejo, P. Fernández‐Ferrín, Eneka Albizu, J. Landeta
{"title":"在管理人员的指导计划中绘制被指导者的结果","authors":"Nuria Gisbert-Trejo, P. Fernández‐Ferrín, Eneka Albizu, J. Landeta","doi":"10.1108/ict-07-2022-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to identify, assess and classify the most significant mentee outcomes of formal mentoring processes aimed at managerial development.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAfter conducting an extensive literature review to identify the most significant mentee outcomes in the management field, a survey was conducted with a sample of 80 experienced mentees. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been performed to simplify and contribute to operationalizing these results. Finally, focus group and nominal group techniques were conducted with practitioners to better understand the findings.\n\n\nFindings\nA total of 27 mentee outcomes have been identified in the literature. EFA analysis has allowed us to downsize the 27 outcomes into four factors encompassing the most relevant mentee outcomes. The authors then provide an interpretation and discussion of the results.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis work compiles, reviews and systematizes existing studies on mentee outcomes in the field of management, classifying the results in a novel manner.\n","PeriodicalId":51647,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping mentee outcomes in mentoring programs for managers\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Gisbert-Trejo, P. Fernández‐Ferrín, Eneka Albizu, J. Landeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ict-07-2022-0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to identify, assess and classify the most significant mentee outcomes of formal mentoring processes aimed at managerial development.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAfter conducting an extensive literature review to identify the most significant mentee outcomes in the management field, a survey was conducted with a sample of 80 experienced mentees. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been performed to simplify and contribute to operationalizing these results. Finally, focus group and nominal group techniques were conducted with practitioners to better understand the findings.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA total of 27 mentee outcomes have been identified in the literature. EFA analysis has allowed us to downsize the 27 outcomes into four factors encompassing the most relevant mentee outcomes. The authors then provide an interpretation and discussion of the results.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis work compiles, reviews and systematizes existing studies on mentee outcomes in the field of management, classifying the results in a novel manner.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-07-2022-0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-07-2022-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在识别、评估和分类以管理发展为目标的正式辅导过程中最重要的学员结果。设计/方法/方法在进行了广泛的文献综述以确定管理领域最重要的学员成果后,对80名经验丰富的学员进行了抽样调查。已经进行了探索性因素分析(EFA),以简化这些结果并有助于将其付诸实践。最后,对从业者进行焦点小组和名义小组技术,以更好地理解研究结果。研究结果文献中共确定了27个受试者的结果。全民教育分析使我们能够将27项成果缩小为四个因素,包括最相关的学员成果。然后,作者对结果进行了解释和讨论。独创性/价值这项工作汇编、回顾和系统化了管理领域现有的关于学员成果的研究,并以新颖的方式对成果进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping mentee outcomes in mentoring programs for managers
Purpose This paper aims to identify, assess and classify the most significant mentee outcomes of formal mentoring processes aimed at managerial development. Design/methodology/approach After conducting an extensive literature review to identify the most significant mentee outcomes in the management field, a survey was conducted with a sample of 80 experienced mentees. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been performed to simplify and contribute to operationalizing these results. Finally, focus group and nominal group techniques were conducted with practitioners to better understand the findings. Findings A total of 27 mentee outcomes have been identified in the literature. EFA analysis has allowed us to downsize the 27 outcomes into four factors encompassing the most relevant mentee outcomes. The authors then provide an interpretation and discussion of the results. Originality/value This work compiles, reviews and systematizes existing studies on mentee outcomes in the field of management, classifying the results in a novel manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: ■Action learning-principles and practice ■Applications of new technology ■Careers management and counselling ■Computer-based training and interactive video ■Continuing management education ■Learning methods, styles and processes ■Managing change ■Marketing, sales and customer services ■New training and learning methods ■Quality circles, team-working and business games ■Recruitment and selection ■Specialist training-needs and methods ■Youth employment and training ■Topicality Too much training theory takes too long to read and may not have immediate practical advantages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信