有发生进行时吗?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

DIALECTICA Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.48106/dial.v74.i3.04

Riccardo Baratella

{"title":"有发生进行时吗?","authors":"Riccardo Baratella","doi":"10.48106/dial.v74.i3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Processes are occurrents that were, are, or will be happening. They endure or they perdure, i.e. they are either \"fully\" present at every time they happen, or they rather have temporal parts. According to Stout (2016), they endure. His argument assumes that processes may change. Then, Stout argues that, if something changes, it endures. As I show, Stout's Argument misses its target. In particular, it makes use of a notion of change that is either intuitive but illegitimate or technical but question-begging.","PeriodicalId":46676,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are There Occurrent Continuants?\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Baratella\",\"doi\":\"10.48106/dial.v74.i3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Processes are occurrents that were, are, or will be happening. They endure or they perdure, i.e. they are either \\\"fully\\\" present at every time they happen, or they rather have temporal parts. According to Stout (2016), they endure. His argument assumes that processes may change. Then, Stout argues that, if something changes, it endures. As I show, Stout's Argument misses its target. In particular, it makes use of a notion of change that is either intuitive but illegitimate or technical but question-begging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i3.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

过程是过去、现在或将要发生的事件。它们要么是持续的，要么是持续的，也就是说，它们要么在每次发生的时候都“完全”存在，要么是有暂时的部分。根据Stout(2016)的说法，它们是持久的。他的论点假设过程可能会改变。然后，斯托特认为，如果有什么变化，它就会持续下去。正如我所展示的，斯托特的论证没有击中目标。特别地，它利用了一种变化的概念，这种概念要么是直觉的，但不合理的，要么是技术的，但会提出问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are There Occurrent Continuants?

Processes are occurrents that were, are, or will be happening. They endure or they perdure, i.e. they are either "fully" present at every time they happen, or they rather have temporal parts. According to Stout (2016), they endure. His argument assumes that processes may change. Then, Stout argues that, if something changes, it endures. As I show, Stout's Argument misses its target. In particular, it makes use of a notion of change that is either intuitive but illegitimate or technical but question-begging.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DIALECTICA PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialectica publishes first-rate articles predominantly in theoretical and systematic philosophy. It is edited in Switzerland and has a focus on analytical philosophy undertaken on the continent. Continuing the work of its founding members, dialectica seeks a better understanding of the mutual support between science and philosophy that both disciplines need and enjoy in their common search for understanding.