在重新评价一个民族时策略性地使用实例论证

Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.1075/jaic.17031.oma
A. A. Omar
{"title":"在重新评价一个民族时策略性地使用实例论证","authors":"A. A. Omar","doi":"10.1075/jaic.17031.oma","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With the help of the extended pragma-dialectical theory, this\n paper aims to analyze how Al Aswany, an Egyptian political columnist who argued\n in favor of the feasibility of democratization before the Arab Spring,\n maneuvered strategically by argumentation from example in two of his columns in\n supporting the standpoint that the Egyptian people had become no longer\n politically inactive. The analysis is conducted in view of the institutional\n preconditions of political columns and the specific rhetorical exigency a\n columnist may face in this specific argumentative situation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strategic use of argumentation from example in\\n re-evaluating a people\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Omar\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.17031.oma\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n With the help of the extended pragma-dialectical theory, this\\n paper aims to analyze how Al Aswany, an Egyptian political columnist who argued\\n in favor of the feasibility of democratization before the Arab Spring,\\n maneuvered strategically by argumentation from example in two of his columns in\\n supporting the standpoint that the Egyptian people had become no longer\\n politically inactive. The analysis is conducted in view of the institutional\\n preconditions of political columns and the specific rhetorical exigency a\\n columnist may face in this specific argumentative situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17031.oma\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17031.oma","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

借助扩展的实用主义辩证理论,本文旨在分析在阿拉伯之春之前主张民主化可行性的埃及政治专栏作家Al-Aswany是如何在他的两篇专栏文章中通过举例论证来支持埃及人民不再在政治上不活跃的观点的。本文的分析是针对政治专栏的制度前提和专栏作家在这种特定的议论文环境中可能面临的特定修辞紧迫性而进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people
With the help of the extended pragma-dialectical theory, this paper aims to analyze how Al Aswany, an Egyptian political columnist who argued in favor of the feasibility of democratization before the Arab Spring, maneuvered strategically by argumentation from example in two of his columns in supporting the standpoint that the Egyptian people had become no longer politically inactive. The analysis is conducted in view of the institutional preconditions of political columns and the specific rhetorical exigency a columnist may face in this specific argumentative situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信