鉴于争议:重新考虑观赏性

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Clotilde Thouret
{"title":"鉴于争议:重新考虑观赏性","authors":"Clotilde Thouret","doi":"10.2357/FMTH-2021-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The controversies about theatre in Europe call for a redefinition of the place and role of theatre in society, and doing so, they invite us to rethink the historiography of theatre (in terms of scale, of objects and of canon). In the light of the controversies, new perspectives may be opened on playwrights and plays. This is particularly the case for spectatorship, which lies at the crossroads of three different historical paths (cultural and aesthetic, scientific and anthropological and theologico-political) and requires an aesthetical approach inspired by pragmatism, since polemical texts aim at the theatrical experience and even more precisely at the uses of the performance by the spectator. Finally, considering responses of Jonson, Shakespeare and Corneille to antitheatrical discourse, this article suggests the emergence, in early modern Europe, of the figure of a singular spectator.","PeriodicalId":55908,"journal":{"name":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","volume":"32 1","pages":"228 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Light of the Controversies: Spectatorship Reconsidered\",\"authors\":\"Clotilde Thouret\",\"doi\":\"10.2357/FMTH-2021-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The controversies about theatre in Europe call for a redefinition of the place and role of theatre in society, and doing so, they invite us to rethink the historiography of theatre (in terms of scale, of objects and of canon). In the light of the controversies, new perspectives may be opened on playwrights and plays. This is particularly the case for spectatorship, which lies at the crossroads of three different historical paths (cultural and aesthetic, scientific and anthropological and theologico-political) and requires an aesthetical approach inspired by pragmatism, since polemical texts aim at the theatrical experience and even more precisely at the uses of the performance by the spectator. Finally, considering responses of Jonson, Shakespeare and Corneille to antitheatrical discourse, this article suggests the emergence, in early modern Europe, of the figure of a singular spectator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FORUM MODERNES THEATER\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"228 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FORUM MODERNES THEATER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2357/FMTH-2021-0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2357/FMTH-2021-0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:欧洲关于戏剧的争议要求重新定义戏剧在社会中的地位和作用,因此,它们邀请我们重新思考戏剧的史学(从规模、对象和经典的角度)。鉴于这些争议,剧作家和戏剧可能会有新的视角。观众观尤其如此,它处于三条不同历史道路(文化和美学、科学和人类学以及神学家政治)的十字路口,需要一种受实用主义启发的美学方法,因为争论性文本旨在戏剧体验,更确切地说是观众对表演的使用。最后,考虑到Jonson、Shakespeare和Cornelle对对立话语的回应,本文认为在现代欧洲早期出现了一个独特的旁观者形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Light of the Controversies: Spectatorship Reconsidered
Abstract:The controversies about theatre in Europe call for a redefinition of the place and role of theatre in society, and doing so, they invite us to rethink the historiography of theatre (in terms of scale, of objects and of canon). In the light of the controversies, new perspectives may be opened on playwrights and plays. This is particularly the case for spectatorship, which lies at the crossroads of three different historical paths (cultural and aesthetic, scientific and anthropological and theologico-political) and requires an aesthetical approach inspired by pragmatism, since polemical texts aim at the theatrical experience and even more precisely at the uses of the performance by the spectator. Finally, considering responses of Jonson, Shakespeare and Corneille to antitheatrical discourse, this article suggests the emergence, in early modern Europe, of the figure of a singular spectator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信