创伤后应激障碍/物质使用障碍合并症:治疗选择和公共卫生需求

Q1 Psychology
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s40501-020-00234-8
Lisa M Najavits, H Westley Clark, Carlo C DiClemente, Marc N Potenza, Howard J Shaffer, James L Sorensen, Matthew T Tull, Allen Zweben, Joan E Zweben
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍/物质使用障碍合并症:治疗选择和公共卫生需求","authors":"Lisa M Najavits, H Westley Clark, Carlo C DiClemente, Marc N Potenza, Howard J Shaffer, James L Sorensen, Matthew T Tull, Allen Zweben, Joan E Zweben","doi":"10.1007/s40501-020-00234-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with substance use disorder (SUD) and is challenging to treat. We review all behavioral therapy models with at least one randomized controlled trial in a current PTSD/SUD population. We identify factors in selecting a model for clinical use, emphasizing a public health framework that balances the need for evidence with the need for feasibility in frontline settings.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Seven published models and 6 unpublished models are reviewed. Public health considerations for choosing a model include: whether it's been studied across a broad range of SUDs and in complex SUD patients; whether it can be conducted in group modality; its appeal to patients and providers; its cost; workforce requirements; and its ability to reduce substance use in addition to PTSD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There are two broad types of models: those that originated in the PTSD field versus the SUD field. Overall, the latter are stronger on public health factors and more feasible in SUD settings. Published models in this category include Relapse Prevention, BRENDA, and Seeking Safety. PTSD/SUD research is at an early stage and there is a need for methodology that quantifies \"level of burden\" (patients' socioeconomic disadvantages) across trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11088,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PTSD / substance use disorder comorbidity: Treatment options and public health needs.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M Najavits, H Westley Clark, Carlo C DiClemente, Marc N Potenza, Howard J Shaffer, James L Sorensen, Matthew T Tull, Allen Zweben, Joan E Zweben\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40501-020-00234-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with substance use disorder (SUD) and is challenging to treat. We review all behavioral therapy models with at least one randomized controlled trial in a current PTSD/SUD population. We identify factors in selecting a model for clinical use, emphasizing a public health framework that balances the need for evidence with the need for feasibility in frontline settings.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Seven published models and 6 unpublished models are reviewed. Public health considerations for choosing a model include: whether it's been studied across a broad range of SUDs and in complex SUD patients; whether it can be conducted in group modality; its appeal to patients and providers; its cost; workforce requirements; and its ability to reduce substance use in addition to PTSD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There are two broad types of models: those that originated in the PTSD field versus the SUD field. Overall, the latter are stronger on public health factors and more feasible in SUD settings. Published models in this category include Relapse Prevention, BRENDA, and Seeking Safety. PTSD/SUD research is at an early stage and there is a need for methodology that quantifies \\\"level of burden\\\" (patients' socioeconomic disadvantages) across trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-020-00234-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-020-00234-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)通常与药物使用障碍(SUD)并发,治疗难度很大。我们回顾了在当前创伤后应激障碍/SUD人群中至少进行过一次随机对照试验的所有行为治疗模式。我们确定了选择临床使用模式的因素,强调了在一线环境中平衡证据需求与可行性需求的公共卫生框架:最新研究结果:回顾了 7 个已发表的模型和 6 个未发表的模型。选择一种模式的公共卫生考虑因素包括:该模式是否在广泛的 SUD 和复杂的 SUD 患者中进行过研究;该模式是否可以以小组的形式进行;该模式对患者和提供者的吸引力;该模式的成本;对劳动力的要求;以及该模式在减少创伤后应激障碍以外的药物使用的能力。总体而言,后者更注重公共卫生因素,在 SUD 环境中更可行。已发表的这类模式包括 "复发预防"、"BRENDA "和 "寻求安全"。创伤后应激障碍/严重创伤后应激障碍的研究还处于早期阶段,需要一种方法来量化各项试验的 "负担水平"(患者的社会经济劣势)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PTSD / substance use disorder comorbidity: Treatment options and public health needs.

Purpose of review: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with substance use disorder (SUD) and is challenging to treat. We review all behavioral therapy models with at least one randomized controlled trial in a current PTSD/SUD population. We identify factors in selecting a model for clinical use, emphasizing a public health framework that balances the need for evidence with the need for feasibility in frontline settings.

Recent findings: Seven published models and 6 unpublished models are reviewed. Public health considerations for choosing a model include: whether it's been studied across a broad range of SUDs and in complex SUD patients; whether it can be conducted in group modality; its appeal to patients and providers; its cost; workforce requirements; and its ability to reduce substance use in addition to PTSD.

Summary: There are two broad types of models: those that originated in the PTSD field versus the SUD field. Overall, the latter are stronger on public health factors and more feasible in SUD settings. Published models in this category include Relapse Prevention, BRENDA, and Seeking Safety. PTSD/SUD research is at an early stage and there is a need for methodology that quantifies "level of burden" (patients' socioeconomic disadvantages) across trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal focuses on the latest advances in the multifaceted treatment of psychiatric disorders. Designed for physicians and other mental health professionals, Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry offers expert reviews on the management of a range of mental health conditions, includingSchizophrenia and other psychotic disordersSubstance use disordersAnxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and related disordersMood disordersEating and other impulse control disordersPersonality disordersArticles cover a range of established and emerging treatment options across the lifespan, and their innovative, hands-on format makes them ideal for informing treatment decisions at the point of care.We accomplish this by appointing leaders in the field to serve as Section Editors in key areas. Section Editors, in turn, select the most pressing topics as well as experts to present the latest research, assess the efficacy of available treatment options, and discuss special considerations.Additionally, an international Editorial Board—representing a range of disciplines within psychiatry and psychology—ensures that the journal content includes current, emerging research and suggests articles of special interest to their country or region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信