印尼万隆街头小贩的安排

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
Рина Хермавати, Каролина Паскарина, Нунунг Руниавати
{"title":"印尼万隆街头小贩的安排","authors":"Рина Хермавати, Каролина Паскарина, Нунунг Руниавати","doi":"10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-659-670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrangement of street vendors in Indonesian cities has yet to find an ideal pattern that can be applied universally across the country. However, the success of street vendor management in one place cannot be replicated in another area. This article presents the analysis of the supervision of street vendors populating Merdeka Street and Cihampelas Street in Bandung, Indonesia, using the best-practice approach. The latter includes the dimensions of impact, partnership, sustainability, leadership and community empowerment, and innovation within local context and transferability. This study uses a qualitative methodology, including research interviews and questionnaires. Interviews were conducted with street vendors and the task unit of street vendors. Questionnaires were distributed to 50 buyers and 50 other community members. So far, street vendors view regulations and rearrangement as decreasing their business opportunities and they prefer to return to informal arrangements. Regulation policies have not been implemented in a sustainable way, and no long-term road map has ever been produced. Moreover, street vendors have not been involved in the planning, action, and post-arrangement stages, raising resentment, dissatisfaction, and distrust among citizens. We conclude that decision-­making on the street vendoring arrangements should go beyond the cost-benefit analysis of street vendors’ profit after the rearrangement of their placements. Rather it should involve the whole scope of social, economic, and public aspects and considerations with the involvement of affected citizens, albeit under the supervision of state actors.","PeriodicalId":43784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Arrangement of Street Vendors In Bandung, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Рина Хермавати, Каролина Паскарина, Нунунг Руниавати\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-659-670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arrangement of street vendors in Indonesian cities has yet to find an ideal pattern that can be applied universally across the country. However, the success of street vendor management in one place cannot be replicated in another area. This article presents the analysis of the supervision of street vendors populating Merdeka Street and Cihampelas Street in Bandung, Indonesia, using the best-practice approach. The latter includes the dimensions of impact, partnership, sustainability, leadership and community empowerment, and innovation within local context and transferability. This study uses a qualitative methodology, including research interviews and questionnaires. Interviews were conducted with street vendors and the task unit of street vendors. Questionnaires were distributed to 50 buyers and 50 other community members. So far, street vendors view regulations and rearrangement as decreasing their business opportunities and they prefer to return to informal arrangements. Regulation policies have not been implemented in a sustainable way, and no long-term road map has ever been produced. Moreover, street vendors have not been involved in the planning, action, and post-arrangement stages, raising resentment, dissatisfaction, and distrust among citizens. We conclude that decision-­making on the street vendoring arrangements should go beyond the cost-benefit analysis of street vendors’ profit after the rearrangement of their placements. Rather it should involve the whole scope of social, economic, and public aspects and considerations with the involvement of affected citizens, albeit under the supervision of state actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Policy Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-659-670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-659-670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印尼城市街头小贩的安排尚未找到一种可以在全国范围内普遍应用的理想模式。然而,街头小贩管理在一个地方的成功不能在另一个地区复制。本文采用最佳实践方法分析了印度尼西亚万隆Merdeka街和Cihampelas街街头小贩的监管情况。后者包括影响、伙伴关系、可持续性、领导力和社区赋权,以及地方背景下的创新和可转让性。本研究采用了定性方法,包括研究访谈和问卷调查。对街头小贩和街头小贩工作队进行了访谈。向50名买家和50名其他社区成员分发了问卷。到目前为止,街头小贩认为监管和重新安排会减少他们的商业机会,他们更喜欢回到非正式的安排。监管政策没有以可持续的方式实施,也没有制定长期路线图。此外,街头小贩没有参与规划、行动和后期安排阶段,这在公民中引发了怨恨、不满和不信任。我们得出的结论是,街头摊贩安排的决策应该超越对街头摊贩重新布局后利润的成本效益分析。相反,它应该涉及整个社会、经济和公共方面,并考虑到受影响公民的参与,尽管是在国家行为者的监督下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Arrangement of Street Vendors In Bandung, Indonesia
The arrangement of street vendors in Indonesian cities has yet to find an ideal pattern that can be applied universally across the country. However, the success of street vendor management in one place cannot be replicated in another area. This article presents the analysis of the supervision of street vendors populating Merdeka Street and Cihampelas Street in Bandung, Indonesia, using the best-practice approach. The latter includes the dimensions of impact, partnership, sustainability, leadership and community empowerment, and innovation within local context and transferability. This study uses a qualitative methodology, including research interviews and questionnaires. Interviews were conducted with street vendors and the task unit of street vendors. Questionnaires were distributed to 50 buyers and 50 other community members. So far, street vendors view regulations and rearrangement as decreasing their business opportunities and they prefer to return to informal arrangements. Regulation policies have not been implemented in a sustainable way, and no long-term road map has ever been produced. Moreover, street vendors have not been involved in the planning, action, and post-arrangement stages, raising resentment, dissatisfaction, and distrust among citizens. We conclude that decision-­making on the street vendoring arrangements should go beyond the cost-benefit analysis of street vendors’ profit after the rearrangement of their placements. Rather it should involve the whole scope of social, economic, and public aspects and considerations with the involvement of affected citizens, albeit under the supervision of state actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Policy Studies provides a forum for scholarly discussion of different aspects of social policy in Russia and abroad. By placing at the center of its analysis the issues of contemporary social, economic, political and cultural transformations societies in transition as well as the reasons and consequences of such changes, the Journal integrates a wide range of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信