工作压力源是否促进或阻碍了工作的形成?员工特质和工作监管重点的作用

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Yufan Shang, Ruonan Zhao, Malika Richards
{"title":"工作压力源是否促进或阻碍了工作的形成?员工特质和工作监管重点的作用","authors":"Yufan Shang, Ruonan Zhao, Malika Richards","doi":"10.1108/cdi-02-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanism through which stressors influence job crafting. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study explores the mediating role of work regulatory focus between the challenge-hindrance stressors and approach-avoidance job crafting and the moderating role of trait regulatory focus.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected survey data in a northwestern city of China from 578 employees working in the finance, real estate and IT industries. Results were analyzed using Mplus 7.FindingsThe results reveal that challenge stressors have a positive effect on both approach job crafting (i.e. increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources and increasing challenging job demands) and avoidance job crafting (i.e. decreasing hindering job demands) via work promotion focus. On the other hand, hindrance stressors have a positive effect on only avoidance job crafting via work prevention focus. In addition, trait promotion focus accentuates the influence of challenge-hindrance stressors on work regulatory focus, as well as the indirect effect of challenge-hindrance stressors on approach-avoidance job crafting respectively. Trait prevention focus only weakens the influence of challenge stressors on work promotion focus.Research limitations/implicationsThis study unfolds how stressors relate to job crafting. However, the cross-sectional design may limit the causal inferences.Originality/valueThis study provides new insight into the relationship between stressors and job crafting by explicating the motivational mechanism and boundary conditions.","PeriodicalId":9597,"journal":{"name":"Career Development International","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do work stressors facilitate or impede job crafting? The role of employee trait and work regulatory focus\",\"authors\":\"Yufan Shang, Ruonan Zhao, Malika Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cdi-02-2022-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanism through which stressors influence job crafting. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study explores the mediating role of work regulatory focus between the challenge-hindrance stressors and approach-avoidance job crafting and the moderating role of trait regulatory focus.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected survey data in a northwestern city of China from 578 employees working in the finance, real estate and IT industries. Results were analyzed using Mplus 7.FindingsThe results reveal that challenge stressors have a positive effect on both approach job crafting (i.e. increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources and increasing challenging job demands) and avoidance job crafting (i.e. decreasing hindering job demands) via work promotion focus. On the other hand, hindrance stressors have a positive effect on only avoidance job crafting via work prevention focus. In addition, trait promotion focus accentuates the influence of challenge-hindrance stressors on work regulatory focus, as well as the indirect effect of challenge-hindrance stressors on approach-avoidance job crafting respectively. Trait prevention focus only weakens the influence of challenge stressors on work promotion focus.Research limitations/implicationsThis study unfolds how stressors relate to job crafting. However, the cross-sectional design may limit the causal inferences.Originality/valueThis study provides new insight into the relationship between stressors and job crafting by explicating the motivational mechanism and boundary conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Career Development International\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Career Development International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-02-2022-0028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Career Development International","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-02-2022-0028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在探讨压力源对工作塑造的影响机制。基于调节焦点理论,本研究探讨了工作调节焦点在挑战-阻碍-压力源和方法-回避-工作塑造之间的中介作用,以及特质调节焦点的调节作用。设计/方法/方法作者在中国西北城市收集了578名金融、房地产和IT行业员工的调查数据。使用Mplus 7对结果进行了分析。结果表明,挑战性压力源通过工作晋升重点对方法工作塑造(即增加结构性工作资源、增加社会工作资源和增加具有挑战性的工作需求)和回避工作塑造(如减少阻碍性工作需求)都有积极影响。另一方面,障碍压力源通过工作预防重点对避免工作的制定有积极影响。此外,特质提升专注分别强调了挑战-障碍压力源对工作调节专注的影响,以及挑战-阻碍压力源对方法回避-工作制定的间接影响。特质预防关注只会削弱挑战性压力源对工作晋升关注的影响。研究局限性/含义这项研究揭示了压力源与工作塑造之间的关系。然而,横截面设计可能会限制因果推断。独创性/价值本研究通过解释动机机制和边界条件,对压力源与工作塑造之间的关系提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do work stressors facilitate or impede job crafting? The role of employee trait and work regulatory focus
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanism through which stressors influence job crafting. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study explores the mediating role of work regulatory focus between the challenge-hindrance stressors and approach-avoidance job crafting and the moderating role of trait regulatory focus.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected survey data in a northwestern city of China from 578 employees working in the finance, real estate and IT industries. Results were analyzed using Mplus 7.FindingsThe results reveal that challenge stressors have a positive effect on both approach job crafting (i.e. increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources and increasing challenging job demands) and avoidance job crafting (i.e. decreasing hindering job demands) via work promotion focus. On the other hand, hindrance stressors have a positive effect on only avoidance job crafting via work prevention focus. In addition, trait promotion focus accentuates the influence of challenge-hindrance stressors on work regulatory focus, as well as the indirect effect of challenge-hindrance stressors on approach-avoidance job crafting respectively. Trait prevention focus only weakens the influence of challenge stressors on work promotion focus.Research limitations/implicationsThis study unfolds how stressors relate to job crafting. However, the cross-sectional design may limit the causal inferences.Originality/valueThis study provides new insight into the relationship between stressors and job crafting by explicating the motivational mechanism and boundary conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Careers and Development are inter-related fields of study with connections to many academic disciplines, organizational practices and policy developments in the emerging knowledge economies and learning societies of the modern world. Career Development International provides a platform for research in these areas that deals with questions of theories and theory development, as well as with organizational career strategy, policy and practice. Issues of theory and of practice may be dealt with at individual, organizational and society levels. The international character of submissions may have two aspects. Submissions may be international in their scope, dealing with a topic that is of concern to researchers throughout the world rather than of sole interest to a national audience. Alternatively, submissions may be international in content, relating, for example, to comparative analyses of careers and development across national boundaries, or dealing with inherently ''international'' issues such as expatriation. Coverage: -Individual careers - psychological and developmental perspectives -Career interventions (systems and tools, mentoring, etc) -Government policy and practices -HR planning and recruitment -International themes and issues (MNCs, expatriation, etc) -Organizational strategies and systems -Performance management -Work and occupational contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信