社会结构、文化与唐纳德·特朗普2016年的魅力

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
C. Knoester, Matthew Knoester
{"title":"社会结构、文化与唐纳德·特朗普2016年的魅力","authors":"C. Knoester, Matthew Knoester","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2170163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using October, 2016 data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N  = 1,461), this study considers the extent to which social structure and culture worked together to activate affinities for Donald Trump. For our analyses, we used multiple regressions and first focused on the extent to which social structural locations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, rurality) were associated with a willingness to trust Trump and report intentions to vote for him. Then, we considered partisanship affiliations. Finally, we looked at the extent to which hegemonically masculine, racial/ethnic and nativist, and authorities on truth values helped to further establish affinities for Trump. Findings indeed revealed that cultural value contestations were central to establishing affinities for Trump. Such beliefs even remained linked to intentions to vote for Trump after accounting for adults’ trust in him.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"33 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Structure, Culture, and the Allure of Donald Trump in 2016\",\"authors\":\"C. Knoester, Matthew Knoester\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2023.2170163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Using October, 2016 data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N  = 1,461), this study considers the extent to which social structure and culture worked together to activate affinities for Donald Trump. For our analyses, we used multiple regressions and first focused on the extent to which social structural locations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, rurality) were associated with a willingness to trust Trump and report intentions to vote for him. Then, we considered partisanship affiliations. Finally, we looked at the extent to which hegemonically masculine, racial/ethnic and nativist, and authorities on truth values helped to further establish affinities for Trump. Findings indeed revealed that cultural value contestations were central to establishing affinities for Trump. Such beliefs even remained linked to intentions to vote for Trump after accounting for adults’ trust in him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2170163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2170163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要使用2016年10月美国成年人全国代表性样本的数据(N = 1461),这项研究考虑了社会结构和文化在多大程度上共同激活了对唐纳德·特朗普的亲和力。在我们的分析中,我们使用了多元回归,首先关注社会结构位置(例如,性别、种族/民族、年龄、教育程度、农村地区)与信任特朗普的意愿和报告投票给他的意愿的关联程度。然后,我们考虑了党派关系。最后,我们研究了霸权男性、种族/族裔和本土主义以及真相价值观权威在多大程度上帮助特朗普进一步建立了亲密关系。调查结果确实表明,文化价值观的争论是建立与特朗普关系的核心。在考虑到成年人对特朗普的信任后,这种信念甚至与投票给特朗普的意图联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Structure, Culture, and the Allure of Donald Trump in 2016
Abstract Using October, 2016 data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N  = 1,461), this study considers the extent to which social structure and culture worked together to activate affinities for Donald Trump. For our analyses, we used multiple regressions and first focused on the extent to which social structural locations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, rurality) were associated with a willingness to trust Trump and report intentions to vote for him. Then, we considered partisanship affiliations. Finally, we looked at the extent to which hegemonically masculine, racial/ethnic and nativist, and authorities on truth values helped to further establish affinities for Trump. Findings indeed revealed that cultural value contestations were central to establishing affinities for Trump. Such beliefs even remained linked to intentions to vote for Trump after accounting for adults’ trust in him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信