土著人民在国家自主贡献中的权利

Q3 Social Sciences

International Human Rights Law Review Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1163/22131035-12010006

Handa S. Abidin

{"title":"土著人民在国家自主贡献中的权利","authors":"Handa S. Abidin","doi":"10.1163/22131035-12010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe inclusion of explanations related to indigenous peoples (ip s) in Nationally Determined Contributions (ndc s) contributes to amplifying the harmony between climate change (cc) and the rights of ip s. The existence of ip s in ndc s explains and improves the position of ip s in their own states, and serves as a model for other parties to the Paris Agreement (pa). Nonetheless, not all parties to the pa mention and have the same standards in explaining the rights of ip s in their ndc s. There are different standards on whether or not the rights of ip s are included in ndc s, and there is also a disparity in the quality and quantity of explanations of the rights of ip s in ndc s. These differences occur in the ‘engagement form’ of Annex i of Decision 4/cma.1 or elsewhere in ndc s.","PeriodicalId":13730,"journal":{"name":"International Human Rights Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Nationally Determined Contributions\",\"authors\":\"Handa S. Abidin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22131035-12010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe inclusion of explanations related to indigenous peoples (ip s) in Nationally Determined Contributions (ndc s) contributes to amplifying the harmony between climate change (cc) and the rights of ip s. The existence of ip s in ndc s explains and improves the position of ip s in their own states, and serves as a model for other parties to the Paris Agreement (pa). Nonetheless, not all parties to the pa mention and have the same standards in explaining the rights of ip s in their ndc s. There are different standards on whether or not the rights of ip s are included in ndc s, and there is also a disparity in the quality and quantity of explanations of the rights of ip s in ndc s. These differences occur in the ‘engagement form’ of Annex i of Decision 4/cma.1 or elsewhere in ndc s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Human Rights Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Human Rights Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-12010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-12010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

列入与土著人民有关的解释（ip s）国家自主贡献 s）有助于加强气候变化与知识产权之间的和谐 s.知识产权的存在 ndc中的s s解释和改进ip的地位并为《巴黎协定》的其他缔约方树立了榜样。尽管如此，并非所有缔约方在解释知识产权方面都提到并有相同的标准 s在他们的ndc s.关于知识产权的权利与否，有不同的标准 s包含在ndc中 s、知识产权解释在质量和数量上也存在差异 ndc中的s s.这些差异出现在第4/cma.1号决定附件一的“约定书”中或ndc的其他地方 s

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Nationally Determined Contributions

The inclusion of explanations related to indigenous peoples (ip s) in Nationally Determined Contributions (ndc s) contributes to amplifying the harmony between climate change (cc) and the rights of ip s. The existence of ip s in ndc s explains and improves the position of ip s in their own states, and serves as a model for other parties to the Paris Agreement (pa). Nonetheless, not all parties to the pa mention and have the same standards in explaining the rights of ip s in their ndc s. There are different standards on whether or not the rights of ip s are included in ndc s, and there is also a disparity in the quality and quantity of explanations of the rights of ip s in ndc s. These differences occur in the ‘engagement form’ of Annex i of Decision 4/cma.1 or elsewhere in ndc s.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Human Rights Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Human Rights Law Review (HRLR) is a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal. It aims to stimulate research and thinking on contemporary human rights issues, problems, challenges and policies. It is particularly interested in soliciting papers, whether in the legal domain or other social sciences, that are unique in their approach and which seek to address poignant concerns of our times. One of the principal aims of the Journal is to provide an outlet to human rights scholars, practitioners and activists in the developing world who have something tangible to say about their experiences on the ground, or in order to discuss cases and practices that are generally inaccessible to European and NorthAmerican audiences. The Editors and the publisher will work hands-on with such contributors to help find solutions where necessary to facilitate translation or language editing in respect of accepted articles. The Journal is aimed at academics, students, government officials, human rights practitioners, and lawyers working in the area, as well as individuals and organisations interested in the area of human rights law. The Journal publishes critical articles that consider human rights law, policy and practice in their various contexts, at global, regional, sub-regional and national levels, book reviews, and a section focused on an up-to-date appraisal of important jurisprudence and practice of the UN and regional human rights systems including those in the developing world.