Y. Feng, Xi Liu, X. Pan, Chang Hu, Ning Zhan, Zongda Zhu, Zhenxiang Deng
{"title":"Cone-Beam CT在癌症立体定向体放射治疗中的剂量验证","authors":"Y. Feng, Xi Liu, X. Pan, Chang Hu, Ning Zhan, Zongda Zhu, Zhenxiang Deng","doi":"10.4236/jct.2021.127039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Verified the delivered dose distribution of lung \ncancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) \nusing the cone-beam CT images. Methods: Twenty lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 100 CBCT \nimages were enrolled in this study. Delivered dose distributions \nwere recalculated on CBCT images with the deformed and non-deformed methods, respectively. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared using the dose-volume histograms. Results: The delivered target coverage (V100) \nper patient inside target volume deviated on average were 0.83% ± 0.86% and \n1.38% ± 1.40% for Pct vs. Pcbct and Pct vs. Pdcbct, respectively. The \nConformity Index (CI) and Gradient Index (GI) showed a good agreement among the \nplans. For the critical organs, only minor differences were observed between \nthe planned dose and the delivered dose. Conclusions: CBCT images were a useful tool for setup and dose delivery verification for lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT.","PeriodicalId":66197,"journal":{"name":"癌症治疗(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivered Dose Verification for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam CT\",\"authors\":\"Y. Feng, Xi Liu, X. Pan, Chang Hu, Ning Zhan, Zongda Zhu, Zhenxiang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jct.2021.127039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Verified the delivered dose distribution of lung \\ncancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) \\nusing the cone-beam CT images. Methods: Twenty lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 100 CBCT \\nimages were enrolled in this study. Delivered dose distributions \\nwere recalculated on CBCT images with the deformed and non-deformed methods, respectively. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared using the dose-volume histograms. Results: The delivered target coverage (V100) \\nper patient inside target volume deviated on average were 0.83% ± 0.86% and \\n1.38% ± 1.40% for Pct vs. Pcbct and Pct vs. Pdcbct, respectively. The \\nConformity Index (CI) and Gradient Index (GI) showed a good agreement among the \\nplans. For the critical organs, only minor differences were observed between \\nthe planned dose and the delivered dose. Conclusions: CBCT images were a useful tool for setup and dose delivery verification for lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":66197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"癌症治疗(英文)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"癌症治疗(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2021.127039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症治疗(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2021.127039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delivered Dose Verification for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam CT
Purpose: Verified the delivered dose distribution of lung
cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
using the cone-beam CT images. Methods: Twenty lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 100 CBCT
images were enrolled in this study. Delivered dose distributions
were recalculated on CBCT images with the deformed and non-deformed methods, respectively. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared using the dose-volume histograms. Results: The delivered target coverage (V100)
per patient inside target volume deviated on average were 0.83% ± 0.86% and
1.38% ± 1.40% for Pct vs. Pcbct and Pct vs. Pdcbct, respectively. The
Conformity Index (CI) and Gradient Index (GI) showed a good agreement among the
plans. For the critical organs, only minor differences were observed between
the planned dose and the delivered dose. Conclusions: CBCT images were a useful tool for setup and dose delivery verification for lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT.