培养的联系和战略沟通：国际环境秘书处是否调整信息以提高其官僚声誉？

IF 2.9 3区社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS

International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s10784-021-09554-3

Linda Mederake, Barbara Saerbeck, Alexandra Goritz, Helge Jörgens, Mareike Well, N. Kolleck

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cultivated ties and strategic communication: do international environmental secretariats tailor information to increase their bureaucratic reputation?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

26.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on the theoretical, methodological and practical dimensions of achieving cooperative solutions to international environmental problems. The journal, which is published four times each year, emphasizes both formal legal agreements (such as multilateral treaties) and less formal cooperative mechanisms (such as ministerial declarations and producer-consumer agreements). The journal''s scope encompasses the full range of environmental and natural resource issues, including (but not limited to) biosafety, biodiversity loss, climate change, desertification, forest conservation, ozone depletion, transboundary pollutant flows, and the management of marine and fresh-water resources. The editors welcome contributions that consider stakeholder initiatives and the role of civil society in the definition and resolution of environmental conflicts. The journal provides a forum on the role of political, economic, and legal considerations in the negotiation and implementation of effective governance strategies. Special emphasis is attached to the following substantive domains: The normative aspects and political economy of treaty negotiations and multilateral agreements, including equity considerations; Methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness of alternative governance mechanisms; The role of stakeholder initiatives and civil society in the definition and resolution of environmental conflicts; The harmonization of environmental strategies with prevailing social, political, and economic institutions.