确定保留教师科学与数学综合表现的框架和研究设计建议

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Bento Cavadas, Sofia Rézio, João Robert Nogueira, Neusa Branco
{"title":"确定保留教师科学与数学综合表现的框架和研究设计建议","authors":"Bento Cavadas, Sofia Rézio, João Robert Nogueira, Neusa Branco","doi":"10.1007/s42330-022-00198-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integration is an important, albeit difficult, goal of science and mathematics education. This paper presents a framework and a research design proposal to identify preservice teachers' (PSTs) integration performance of science and mathematics (IPoSM). It also presents the classification of PSTs' level of integration in each phase of a problem-based learning (PBL) activity, within the proposed framework, and evidence of their work. The framework is organized in three levels of integration, based on current research, and detailed with specific integration indicators about an exemplary PBL activity, named <i>STEM Bees</i>. This PBL activity was structured as a research problem divided into two integrated problems. A qualitative methodology was used, focused on the application of the framework to the work of PSTs in that PBL activity. The final participants were 13 PSTs, organized in four working groups. In general, results show that PSTs' integration performance was higher with the second problem than with the first problem. However, full integration with meaningful connections between science and mathematics ideas was achieved by almost all PST at the conclusion of the research problem. The IPoSM framework indicators proved to be useful for identifying the level of integration of science and mathematics in PSTs' work in each phase of the PBL activity. Keeping the IPoSM framework in mind, teacher educators could elaborate more effective problem-based integrated approaches of science and mathematics in initial teacher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":45763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework and a Research Design Proposal to Identify Preservice Teachers' Integration Performance of Science and Mathematics.\",\"authors\":\"Bento Cavadas, Sofia Rézio, João Robert Nogueira, Neusa Branco\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42330-022-00198-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integration is an important, albeit difficult, goal of science and mathematics education. This paper presents a framework and a research design proposal to identify preservice teachers' (PSTs) integration performance of science and mathematics (IPoSM). It also presents the classification of PSTs' level of integration in each phase of a problem-based learning (PBL) activity, within the proposed framework, and evidence of their work. The framework is organized in three levels of integration, based on current research, and detailed with specific integration indicators about an exemplary PBL activity, named <i>STEM Bees</i>. This PBL activity was structured as a research problem divided into two integrated problems. A qualitative methodology was used, focused on the application of the framework to the work of PSTs in that PBL activity. The final participants were 13 PSTs, organized in four working groups. In general, results show that PSTs' integration performance was higher with the second problem than with the first problem. However, full integration with meaningful connections between science and mathematics ideas was achieved by almost all PST at the conclusion of the research problem. The IPoSM framework indicators proved to be useful for identifying the level of integration of science and mathematics in PSTs' work in each phase of the PBL activity. Keeping the IPoSM framework in mind, teacher educators could elaborate more effective problem-based integrated approaches of science and mathematics in initial teacher education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9027031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00198-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00198-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整合是科学和数学教育的一个重要目标,尽管难度很大。本文提出了一个框架和研究设计建议,以确定职前教师(PSTs)的科学与数学整合表现(IPoSM)。本文还介绍了在建议的框架内,职前教师在基于问题的学习(PBL)活动的每个阶段的整合水平分类,以及他们工作的证据。该框架以当前的研究为基础,分为三个整合水平,并详细介绍了一项名为 "STEM 蜜蜂 "的示范性 PBL 活动的具体整合指标。该 PBL 活动的结构是一个研究问题分为两个综合问题。我们采用了定性方法,重点是将该框架应用于 PST 在该 PBL 活动中的工作。最终有 13 名 PST 参加了这项活动,他们分成四个工作小组。总的来说,结果表明,PST 在第二个问题上的整合表现要高于第一个问题。不过,在研究问题结束时,几乎所有 PST 都实现了科学与数学思想之间有意义联系的全面整合。事实证明,IpoSM 框架指标有助于确定 PST 在 PBL 活动各阶段工作中的科学与数学整合水平。教师教育工作者可根据 "基于问题的科学与数学整合 "框架,在初始教师教育中制定更有效的基于问题的科学与数学整合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Framework and a Research Design Proposal to Identify Preservice Teachers' Integration Performance of Science and Mathematics.

Integration is an important, albeit difficult, goal of science and mathematics education. This paper presents a framework and a research design proposal to identify preservice teachers' (PSTs) integration performance of science and mathematics (IPoSM). It also presents the classification of PSTs' level of integration in each phase of a problem-based learning (PBL) activity, within the proposed framework, and evidence of their work. The framework is organized in three levels of integration, based on current research, and detailed with specific integration indicators about an exemplary PBL activity, named STEM Bees. This PBL activity was structured as a research problem divided into two integrated problems. A qualitative methodology was used, focused on the application of the framework to the work of PSTs in that PBL activity. The final participants were 13 PSTs, organized in four working groups. In general, results show that PSTs' integration performance was higher with the second problem than with the first problem. However, full integration with meaningful connections between science and mathematics ideas was achieved by almost all PST at the conclusion of the research problem. The IPoSM framework indicators proved to be useful for identifying the level of integration of science and mathematics in PSTs' work in each phase of the PBL activity. Keeping the IPoSM framework in mind, teacher educators could elaborate more effective problem-based integrated approaches of science and mathematics in initial teacher education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education is the premier Canadian academic journal, and one of the leading journals internationally, in the field of STEM education. Published in both English and French, the journal aims to be both Canadian and international in scope. The journal provides a forum for the publication of original articles in a variety of styles, including research investigations using experimental, qualitative, ethnographic, historical, philosophical, or case study approaches; critical reviews of the literature; policy perspectives; and position papers, curriculum arguments, and discussion of issues in teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信