通过IRT双因子模型构建主观幸福感维度:来自意大利研究的证据

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
C. Bernini, M. Matteucci, S. Mignani
{"title":"通过IRT双因子模型构建主观幸福感维度:来自意大利研究的证据","authors":"C. Bernini, M. Matteucci, S. Mignani","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The investigation of individual and community well-being has acquired a particular relevance over time for governments to develop strategies and identify resources for improving standards of living. To this aim, it is necessary to analyse changes at the overall level and examine how subjective well-being differs between different sub-groups of the population as well as across local areas. Using data measuring the well-being of residents in the Romagna area (Italy), we propose a multidimensional approach within the item response theory (IRT) framework to estimate an overall score of community Subjective Well-Being (SWB) and individual scores reflecting specific dimensions, taking into account for the ordinal polytomous nature of the items. The results show that aspects dealing with Life Evaluation mainly affect the overall SWB, while issues pertaining to Community and Environment are less important. The proposed approach is effective in developing an indicator taking into account the multidimensionality of SWB and estimating individual scores reflecting the heterogeneity among residents.","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"11 1","pages":"427-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling Subjective Well-Being dimensions through an IRT bifactor model: Evidences from an Italian study\",\"authors\":\"C. Bernini, M. Matteucci, S. Mignani\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The investigation of individual and community well-being has acquired a particular relevance over time for governments to develop strategies and identify resources for improving standards of living. To this aim, it is necessary to analyse changes at the overall level and examine how subjective well-being differs between different sub-groups of the population as well as across local areas. Using data measuring the well-being of residents in the Romagna area (Italy), we propose a multidimensional approach within the item response theory (IRT) framework to estimate an overall score of community Subjective Well-Being (SWB) and individual scores reflecting specific dimensions, taking into account for the ordinal polytomous nature of the items. The results show that aspects dealing with Life Evaluation mainly affect the overall SWB, while issues pertaining to Community and Environment are less important. The proposed approach is effective in developing an indicator taking into account the multidimensionality of SWB and estimating individual scores reflecting the heterogeneity among residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"427-446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V11N2P427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着时间的推移,对个人和社区福祉的调查对政府制定提高生活水平的战略和确定资源具有特别的意义。为此,有必要从整体层面分析变化,并研究不同人口亚群体以及不同地区的主观幸福感有何不同。利用测量罗马涅地区(意大利)居民幸福感的数据,我们在项目反应理论(IRT)框架内提出了一种多维方法,以估计社区主观幸福感(SWB)的总体得分和反映特定维度的个人得分,同时考虑到项目的顺序多元性。研究结果表明,生命评估主要影响整体主观幸福感,而社区和环境问题则不那么重要。所提出的方法在制定考虑主观幸福感多维性的指标和估计反映居民异质性的个人得分方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling Subjective Well-Being dimensions through an IRT bifactor model: Evidences from an Italian study
The investigation of individual and community well-being has acquired a particular relevance over time for governments to develop strategies and identify resources for improving standards of living. To this aim, it is necessary to analyse changes at the overall level and examine how subjective well-being differs between different sub-groups of the population as well as across local areas. Using data measuring the well-being of residents in the Romagna area (Italy), we propose a multidimensional approach within the item response theory (IRT) framework to estimate an overall score of community Subjective Well-Being (SWB) and individual scores reflecting specific dimensions, taking into account for the ordinal polytomous nature of the items. The results show that aspects dealing with Life Evaluation mainly affect the overall SWB, while issues pertaining to Community and Environment are less important. The proposed approach is effective in developing an indicator taking into account the multidimensionality of SWB and estimating individual scores reflecting the heterogeneity among residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信