研究性实验的理论与实践问题

O. Chelysheva
{"title":"研究性实验的理论与实践问题","authors":"O. Chelysheva","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-176-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the investigative experiment as one of the types of procedural actions performed within the framework of criminal proceedings. In the intro­duction, the genesis of the theoretical foundations of the investigative experiment is considered, the rel­evance of the topic of the article in the modern setting is indicated. The Author identified problems associated with understanding the investigative method of research, which underlies the investigative experiment as an investigative action, noted the controversy of individual judgments expressed in foren­sic literature. The Author refutes an attempt to define the essence of the investigative experiment through the concept of «reproduction». In this regard, the legislative approach to the definition of an investigative experiment has been criticized, which does not make it possible to distinguish an investigative experi­ment from other investigative actions related to the reproduction of actions, events, reconstruction of the situation, etc. Particularly important is the delimitation of the investigative experiment from the veri­fication of testimony on the spot. The necessity of formulating the definition of the concept of an investi­gative experiment through the concept of «experience» is substantiated. In addition, the issues of classifi­cation of investigative experiments, which are based on the intended purpose of the investigative action, are considered. The theoretical and practical significance of the proposed classification is substantiated. The Author of the article describes the features of the tactics of conducting an investigative experiment, depending on its assignment to a particular group. In particular, the features of the use of «props» used in the process of experiments, determining the composition of the participants in the investigative action, the need to recreate the conditions of a real event are reflected. In addition, the issues of using the re­sults of an investigative experiment in proving in criminal cases are raised, in connection with which questions are raised about the features of evaluating the results of the investigative action in question. Thus, within the framework of the article, the epistemological essence of the investigative experiment is investigated, the definition of the concept of this investigative action is formulated, the types of inves­tigative experiments are presented and their content is disclosed. The main tactical recommendations for the production of certain types of investigative experiments are substantiated.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems of Theory and Practice of Investigative Experiment\",\"authors\":\"O. Chelysheva\",\"doi\":\"10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-176-184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the investigative experiment as one of the types of procedural actions performed within the framework of criminal proceedings. In the intro­duction, the genesis of the theoretical foundations of the investigative experiment is considered, the rel­evance of the topic of the article in the modern setting is indicated. The Author identified problems associated with understanding the investigative method of research, which underlies the investigative experiment as an investigative action, noted the controversy of individual judgments expressed in foren­sic literature. The Author refutes an attempt to define the essence of the investigative experiment through the concept of «reproduction». In this regard, the legislative approach to the definition of an investigative experiment has been criticized, which does not make it possible to distinguish an investigative experi­ment from other investigative actions related to the reproduction of actions, events, reconstruction of the situation, etc. Particularly important is the delimitation of the investigative experiment from the veri­fication of testimony on the spot. The necessity of formulating the definition of the concept of an investi­gative experiment through the concept of «experience» is substantiated. In addition, the issues of classifi­cation of investigative experiments, which are based on the intended purpose of the investigative action, are considered. The theoretical and practical significance of the proposed classification is substantiated. The Author of the article describes the features of the tactics of conducting an investigative experiment, depending on its assignment to a particular group. In particular, the features of the use of «props» used in the process of experiments, determining the composition of the participants in the investigative action, the need to recreate the conditions of a real event are reflected. In addition, the issues of using the re­sults of an investigative experiment in proving in criminal cases are raised, in connection with which questions are raised about the features of evaluating the results of the investigative action in question. Thus, within the framework of the article, the epistemological essence of the investigative experiment is investigated, the definition of the concept of this investigative action is formulated, the types of inves­tigative experiments are presented and their content is disclosed. The main tactical recommendations for the production of certain types of investigative experiments are substantiated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-176-184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-176-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文致力于对侦查实验作为刑事诉讼框架内的一种程序性行为进行全面研究。在引言部分,对研究性实验的理论基础的起源进行了思考,并指出了本文主题在现代背景下的相关性。发件人指出了与理解作为调查行动的调查实验的基础的调查研究方法有关的问题,并指出了法医文献中表达的个人判断的争议。作者驳斥了通过“再生产”的概念来定义调查性实验的本质的企图。在这方面,对调查实验的定义的立法方法受到了批评,因为这种方法无法将调查实验与与行动、事件的再现、情况的重建等有关的其他调查行动区分开来。特别重要的是将调查实验与现场证言的核实区分开来。通过“经验”的概念来形成研究性实验概念定义的必要性得到了证实。此外,还考虑了调查实验的分类问题,该问题是基于调查行动的预期目的。该分类方法的理论和实践意义得到了证实。这篇文章的作者描述了进行调查性实验的策略的特点,这取决于它被分配给一个特定的群体。特别是,在实验过程中使用“道具”的特点,确定调查行动中参与者的组成,需要重现真实事件的条件。此外,还提出了在刑事案件中利用调查实验结果进行证明的问题,并就此提出了评价有关调查行动结果的特点的问题。因此,在本文的框架内,调查实验的认识论本质被调查,这一调查行动的概念的定义被制定,调查实验的类型被提出,其内容被披露。对制作某些类型的调查性实验的主要战术建议是有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problems of Theory and Practice of Investigative Experiment
The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the investigative experiment as one of the types of procedural actions performed within the framework of criminal proceedings. In the intro­duction, the genesis of the theoretical foundations of the investigative experiment is considered, the rel­evance of the topic of the article in the modern setting is indicated. The Author identified problems associated with understanding the investigative method of research, which underlies the investigative experiment as an investigative action, noted the controversy of individual judgments expressed in foren­sic literature. The Author refutes an attempt to define the essence of the investigative experiment through the concept of «reproduction». In this regard, the legislative approach to the definition of an investigative experiment has been criticized, which does not make it possible to distinguish an investigative experi­ment from other investigative actions related to the reproduction of actions, events, reconstruction of the situation, etc. Particularly important is the delimitation of the investigative experiment from the veri­fication of testimony on the spot. The necessity of formulating the definition of the concept of an investi­gative experiment through the concept of «experience» is substantiated. In addition, the issues of classifi­cation of investigative experiments, which are based on the intended purpose of the investigative action, are considered. The theoretical and practical significance of the proposed classification is substantiated. The Author of the article describes the features of the tactics of conducting an investigative experiment, depending on its assignment to a particular group. In particular, the features of the use of «props» used in the process of experiments, determining the composition of the participants in the investigative action, the need to recreate the conditions of a real event are reflected. In addition, the issues of using the re­sults of an investigative experiment in proving in criminal cases are raised, in connection with which questions are raised about the features of evaluating the results of the investigative action in question. Thus, within the framework of the article, the epistemological essence of the investigative experiment is investigated, the definition of the concept of this investigative action is formulated, the types of inves­tigative experiments are presented and their content is disclosed. The main tactical recommendations for the production of certain types of investigative experiments are substantiated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信