关于哥德尔、普里斯特和天真证明的一个注记

IF 0.6 Q2 LOGIC
Massimiliano Carrara, Enrico Martino
{"title":"关于哥德尔、普里斯特和天真证明的一个注记","authors":"Massimiliano Carrara, Enrico Martino","doi":"10.12775/llp.2020.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1951 Gibbs lecture, Godel asserted his famous dichotomy, where the notion of informal proof is at work. G. Priest developed an argument, grounded on the notion of naive proof, to the effect that Godel’s first incompleteness theorem suggests the presence of dialetheias. In this paper, we adopt a plausible ideal notion of naive proof, in agreement with Godel’s conception, superseding the criticisms against the usual notion of naive proof used by real working mathematicians. We explore the connection between Godel’s theorem and naive proof so understood, both from a classical and a dialetheic perspective.","PeriodicalId":43501,"journal":{"name":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Note on Gödel, Priest and Naïve Proof\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Carrara, Enrico Martino\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/llp.2020.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 1951 Gibbs lecture, Godel asserted his famous dichotomy, where the notion of informal proof is at work. G. Priest developed an argument, grounded on the notion of naive proof, to the effect that Godel’s first incompleteness theorem suggests the presence of dialetheias. In this paper, we adopt a plausible ideal notion of naive proof, in agreement with Godel’s conception, superseding the criticisms against the usual notion of naive proof used by real working mathematicians. We explore the connection between Godel’s theorem and naive proof so understood, both from a classical and a dialetheic perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logic and Logical Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logic and Logical Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2020.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2020.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1951年吉布斯的演讲中,哥德尔断言了他著名的二分法,即非正式证明的概念在起作用。G.普里斯特提出了一个基于天真证明概念的论点,大意是哥德尔的第一个不完全性定理表明了辩证法的存在。在本文中,我们采用了一个看似合理的天真证明的理想概念,这与哥德尔的概念一致,取代了对真正工作的数学家通常使用的天真证明概念的批评。我们从古典和辩证的角度探讨了哥德尔定理和人们所理解的天真证明之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Note on Gödel, Priest and Naïve Proof
In the 1951 Gibbs lecture, Godel asserted his famous dichotomy, where the notion of informal proof is at work. G. Priest developed an argument, grounded on the notion of naive proof, to the effect that Godel’s first incompleteness theorem suggests the presence of dialetheias. In this paper, we adopt a plausible ideal notion of naive proof, in agreement with Godel’s conception, superseding the criticisms against the usual notion of naive proof used by real working mathematicians. We explore the connection between Godel’s theorem and naive proof so understood, both from a classical and a dialetheic perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信