根除与预防性宫颈环扎术相关的宫颈管定植:前瞻性的进一步研究。

Ginekologia polska Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.5603/gpl.96507
Natalia Sroka-Ostrowska, Radoslaw Pietrzak, Dominika Pykalo-Gawinska, Julia Zareba-Szczudlik, Krzysztof Czajkowski, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz
{"title":"根除与预防性宫颈环扎术相关的宫颈管定植:前瞻性的进一步研究。","authors":"Natalia Sroka-Ostrowska, Radoslaw Pietrzak, Dominika Pykalo-Gawinska, Julia Zareba-Szczudlik, Krzysztof Czajkowski, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz","doi":"10.5603/gpl.96507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The perioperative management of the cervical cerclage procedure is not unified. In general population controlling microbiome cervical status does not affect obstetric outcomes, but it might be beneficial in patients with cervical insufficiency. The aim of our study was to present the obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcomes of patients undergoing the cervical cerclage placement procedure in our obstetric department using a regimen of care that includes control of the microbiological status of the cervix and elimination of the pathogens detected.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients undergoing cervical cerclage in the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were included in the study. The procedure was performed only after receiving a negative culture from the cervical canal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one (88.6%) patients delivered after the 34th and twenty-eight (80.0%) after the 37th week of gestation. The colonization of the genital tract was present in 31% of patients prior to the procedure, in 42% of patients - during the subsequent pregnancy course and in 48% of patients - before delivery. A total of 85% of patients who had miscarriage or delivered prematurely had abnormal cervical cultures. In patients with normal cervical cultures, and 91.7% of women delivered at term. No abnormalities in children's development were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Controlling microbiological status of the cervical canal results in better or similar outcomes to those reported by other authors in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Active eradication of the reproductive tract colonization potentially increases the effectiveness of the cervical cerclage placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eradication of cervical canal colonization associated with prophylactic cervical cerclage: the look further study.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Sroka-Ostrowska, Radoslaw Pietrzak, Dominika Pykalo-Gawinska, Julia Zareba-Szczudlik, Krzysztof Czajkowski, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.96507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The perioperative management of the cervical cerclage procedure is not unified. In general population controlling microbiome cervical status does not affect obstetric outcomes, but it might be beneficial in patients with cervical insufficiency. The aim of our study was to present the obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcomes of patients undergoing the cervical cerclage placement procedure in our obstetric department using a regimen of care that includes control of the microbiological status of the cervix and elimination of the pathogens detected.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients undergoing cervical cerclage in the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were included in the study. The procedure was performed only after receiving a negative culture from the cervical canal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one (88.6%) patients delivered after the 34th and twenty-eight (80.0%) after the 37th week of gestation. The colonization of the genital tract was present in 31% of patients prior to the procedure, in 42% of patients - during the subsequent pregnancy course and in 48% of patients - before delivery. A total of 85% of patients who had miscarriage or delivered prematurely had abnormal cervical cultures. In patients with normal cervical cultures, and 91.7% of women delivered at term. No abnormalities in children's development were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Controlling microbiological status of the cervical canal results in better or similar outcomes to those reported by other authors in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Active eradication of the reproductive tract colonization potentially increases the effectiveness of the cervical cerclage placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"92-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.96507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.96507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:宫颈环扎术的围手术期管理不统一。在一般人群中,控制微生物组的宫颈状况不会影响产科结果,但对宫颈功能不全患者可能有益。我们研究的目的是介绍在产科接受宫颈环扎术的患者的产科、新生儿和儿科结果,采用包括控制宫颈微生物状态和消除检测到的病原体在内的护理方案。材料和方法:华沙医科大学妇产科第二系35名接受宫颈环扎术的患者被纳入研究。该手术仅在接受来自宫颈管的阴性培养后进行。结果:31例(88.6%)患者在妊娠34周后分娩,28例(80.0%)患者在孕37周后分娩。31%的患者在手术前、42%的患者在随后的妊娠过程中以及48%的患者在分娩前出现生殖道定植。流产或早产的患者中,共有85%的宫颈培养异常。在宫颈培养正常的患者中,91.7%的妇女在足月分娩。未发现儿童发育异常。结论:在产科和新生儿结局方面,控制宫颈管的微生物状况会产生更好或类似于其他作者报道的结果。积极根除生殖道定植可能会提高宫颈环扎术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eradication of cervical canal colonization associated with prophylactic cervical cerclage: the look further study.

Objectives: The perioperative management of the cervical cerclage procedure is not unified. In general population controlling microbiome cervical status does not affect obstetric outcomes, but it might be beneficial in patients with cervical insufficiency. The aim of our study was to present the obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcomes of patients undergoing the cervical cerclage placement procedure in our obstetric department using a regimen of care that includes control of the microbiological status of the cervix and elimination of the pathogens detected.

Material and methods: Thirty-five patients undergoing cervical cerclage in the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were included in the study. The procedure was performed only after receiving a negative culture from the cervical canal.

Results: Thirty-one (88.6%) patients delivered after the 34th and twenty-eight (80.0%) after the 37th week of gestation. The colonization of the genital tract was present in 31% of patients prior to the procedure, in 42% of patients - during the subsequent pregnancy course and in 48% of patients - before delivery. A total of 85% of patients who had miscarriage or delivered prematurely had abnormal cervical cultures. In patients with normal cervical cultures, and 91.7% of women delivered at term. No abnormalities in children's development were found.

Conclusions: Controlling microbiological status of the cervical canal results in better or similar outcomes to those reported by other authors in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Active eradication of the reproductive tract colonization potentially increases the effectiveness of the cervical cerclage placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信