关于维生素C对普通感冒影响的YouTube视频内容分析。

IF 1.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-18 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.23.0093
Donghwi Park, Sang Gyu Kwak, Saeyoon Kim, Min Cheol Chang
{"title":"关于维生素C对普通感冒影响的YouTube视频内容分析。","authors":"Donghwi Park, Sang Gyu Kwak, Saeyoon Kim, Min Cheol Chang","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.23.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growth of the Internet, social media platforms have emerged as major sources of medical information. We assessed the reliability, quality, and accuracy of the most-viewed YouTube videos containing information on the effect of vitamin C on the common cold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The YouTube videos were searched on August 1, 2022, using the keywords: (\"ascorbic acid\" OR \"vitamin C\" OR \"Sodium Ascorbate\" OR \"L-ascorbic\") AND \"common cold\". The 30 most-viewed videos were included in our study. The reliability and quality of the videos were analyzed using modified DISCERN and Global Quality Scales, respectively. When the videos included at least one correct or inaccurate scientific statement about the effect of vitamin C on the common cold, they were classified as accurate or misleading videos, respectively; those without any pertinent information were considered neither accurate nor misleading. If a video contained both accurate and inaccurate statements, it was classified as misleading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 most-viewed videos, 73% were unreliable, and 67% contained misleading information and were of a poor quality. Of these 30 videos, 14 videos were produced and posted by customers who were not specialized in medicine or nutrition. Moreover, these videos were of significantly lower reliability, quality, and accuracy than those produced by nutrition or fitness channels or by medical or nutrition professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability, quality, and accuracy of videos uploaded by non-professionals were low. Therefore, video creators should upload reliable, high-quality videos to ensure the dissemination of accurate medical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"342-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667075/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content Analysis of YouTube Videos on the Effect of Vitamin C on Common Cold.\",\"authors\":\"Donghwi Park, Sang Gyu Kwak, Saeyoon Kim, Min Cheol Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.4082/kjfm.23.0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growth of the Internet, social media platforms have emerged as major sources of medical information. We assessed the reliability, quality, and accuracy of the most-viewed YouTube videos containing information on the effect of vitamin C on the common cold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The YouTube videos were searched on August 1, 2022, using the keywords: (\\\"ascorbic acid\\\" OR \\\"vitamin C\\\" OR \\\"Sodium Ascorbate\\\" OR \\\"L-ascorbic\\\") AND \\\"common cold\\\". The 30 most-viewed videos were included in our study. The reliability and quality of the videos were analyzed using modified DISCERN and Global Quality Scales, respectively. When the videos included at least one correct or inaccurate scientific statement about the effect of vitamin C on the common cold, they were classified as accurate or misleading videos, respectively; those without any pertinent information were considered neither accurate nor misleading. If a video contained both accurate and inaccurate statements, it was classified as misleading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 most-viewed videos, 73% were unreliable, and 67% contained misleading information and were of a poor quality. Of these 30 videos, 14 videos were produced and posted by customers who were not specialized in medicine or nutrition. Moreover, these videos were of significantly lower reliability, quality, and accuracy than those produced by nutrition or fitness channels or by medical or nutrition professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability, quality, and accuracy of videos uploaded by non-professionals were low. Therefore, video creators should upload reliable, high-quality videos to ensure the dissemination of accurate medical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"342-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:随着互联网的发展,社交媒体平台已成为医疗信息的主要来源。我们评估了YouTube上观看次数最多的视频的可靠性、质量和准确性,这些视频包含维生素C对普通感冒的影响信息。方法:于2022年8月1日搜索YouTube视频,关键词为:(“抗坏血酸”或“维生素C”或“抗坏血酸钠”或“L-抗坏血酸”)和“普通感冒”。我们的研究中包括了30个观看次数最多的视频。分别使用改进的DISCERN和全局质量量表对视频的可靠性和质量进行了分析。当视频中至少包含一个关于维生素C对普通感冒影响的正确或不准确的科学陈述时,它们分别被归类为准确或误导性视频;那些没有任何相关信息的人被认为既不准确也不具有误导性。如果一段视频包含准确和不准确的陈述,则被归类为误导。结果:在观看次数最多的30个视频中,73%不可靠,67%包含误导性信息,质量较差。在这30个视频中,有14个视频是由非医学或营养专业的客户制作和发布的。此外,这些视频的可靠性、质量和准确性明显低于营养或健身频道或医疗或营养专业人员制作的视频。结论:非专业人员上传视频的可靠性、质量和准确性较低。因此,视频创作者应该上传可靠、高质量的视频,以确保准确的医疗信息的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content Analysis of YouTube Videos on the Effect of Vitamin C on Common Cold.

Background: With the growth of the Internet, social media platforms have emerged as major sources of medical information. We assessed the reliability, quality, and accuracy of the most-viewed YouTube videos containing information on the effect of vitamin C on the common cold.

Methods: The YouTube videos were searched on August 1, 2022, using the keywords: ("ascorbic acid" OR "vitamin C" OR "Sodium Ascorbate" OR "L-ascorbic") AND "common cold". The 30 most-viewed videos were included in our study. The reliability and quality of the videos were analyzed using modified DISCERN and Global Quality Scales, respectively. When the videos included at least one correct or inaccurate scientific statement about the effect of vitamin C on the common cold, they were classified as accurate or misleading videos, respectively; those without any pertinent information were considered neither accurate nor misleading. If a video contained both accurate and inaccurate statements, it was classified as misleading.

Results: Of the 30 most-viewed videos, 73% were unreliable, and 67% contained misleading information and were of a poor quality. Of these 30 videos, 14 videos were produced and posted by customers who were not specialized in medicine or nutrition. Moreover, these videos were of significantly lower reliability, quality, and accuracy than those produced by nutrition or fitness channels or by medical or nutrition professionals.

Conclusion: The reliability, quality, and accuracy of videos uploaded by non-professionals were low. Therefore, video creators should upload reliable, high-quality videos to ensure the dissemination of accurate medical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信