ustekinumab治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的真实疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Genta Uchida, Masanao Nakamura, Takeshi Yamamura, Tomoyuki Tsuzuki, Hiroki Kawashima
{"title":"ustekinumab治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的真实疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Genta Uchida,&nbsp;Masanao Nakamura,&nbsp;Takeshi Yamamura,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Tsuzuki,&nbsp;Hiroki Kawashima","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.85.3.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ustekinumab has recently been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) based on data from clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting remains unclear. Hence, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab in a real-world setting and to investigate the predictors of its effectiveness. A comprehensive literature search was performed to examine the effectiveness of ustekinumab in UC patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2021. Data on clinical remission, response, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity and the impact of moderators on the outcomes of interest. A total of 14 eligible studies were identified. The pooled clinical remission rate was 55.0% at week 8, 36.1% at week 16, 46.6% at month 6, and 38.6% at month 12. The meta-regression analysis showed that prior use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab and the publication style were significant moderators. Additionally, out of 258 patients, there were 28 adverse events (AEs) (10.9%). The effectiveness of ustekinumab in real-world patients with UC was consistent with the results clinical trials. Moreover, previous treatment with anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab might have affected the effectiveness of ustekinumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"85 3","pages":"402-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/f5/2186-3326-85-0402.PMC10565585.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab for patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Genta Uchida,&nbsp;Masanao Nakamura,&nbsp;Takeshi Yamamura,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Tsuzuki,&nbsp;Hiroki Kawashima\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/nagjms.85.3.402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ustekinumab has recently been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) based on data from clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting remains unclear. Hence, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab in a real-world setting and to investigate the predictors of its effectiveness. A comprehensive literature search was performed to examine the effectiveness of ustekinumab in UC patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2021. Data on clinical remission, response, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity and the impact of moderators on the outcomes of interest. A total of 14 eligible studies were identified. The pooled clinical remission rate was 55.0% at week 8, 36.1% at week 16, 46.6% at month 6, and 38.6% at month 12. The meta-regression analysis showed that prior use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab and the publication style were significant moderators. Additionally, out of 258 patients, there were 28 adverse events (AEs) (10.9%). The effectiveness of ustekinumab in real-world patients with UC was consistent with the results clinical trials. Moreover, previous treatment with anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab might have affected the effectiveness of ustekinumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"85 3\",\"pages\":\"402-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/f5/2186-3326-85-0402.PMC10565585.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.85.3.402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.85.3.402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据临床试验数据,Ustekinumab最近被批准用于治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。然而,在现实世界中,ustekinumab对UC患者的有效性仍不清楚。因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估ustekinumab在现实世界中的有效性,并研究其有效性的预测因素。对2019年1月至2021年12月期间入院的UC患者进行了全面的文献检索,以检查ustekinumab的有效性。提取、汇总和分析临床缓解率、反应率和无皮质类固醇临床缓解率的数据。进行荟萃回归分析,以调查异质性的来源以及调节因子对感兴趣结果的影响。共确定了14项符合条件的研究。合并临床缓解率在第8周为55.0%,在第16周为36.1%,在第6个月为46.6%,在第12个月为38.6%。荟萃回归分析显示,既往使用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物和维多利珠单抗以及发表方式是显著的调节因素。此外,在258名患者中,有28例不良事件(AE)(10.9%)。ustekinumab在现实世界UC患者中的有效性与临床试验结果一致。此外,先前使用抗TNF药物和维多利珠单抗的治疗可能会影响ustekinumab的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab for patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ustekinumab has recently been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) based on data from clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting remains unclear. Hence, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab in a real-world setting and to investigate the predictors of its effectiveness. A comprehensive literature search was performed to examine the effectiveness of ustekinumab in UC patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2021. Data on clinical remission, response, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity and the impact of moderators on the outcomes of interest. A total of 14 eligible studies were identified. The pooled clinical remission rate was 55.0% at week 8, 36.1% at week 16, 46.6% at month 6, and 38.6% at month 12. The meta-regression analysis showed that prior use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab and the publication style were significant moderators. Additionally, out of 258 patients, there were 28 adverse events (AEs) (10.9%). The effectiveness of ustekinumab in real-world patients with UC was consistent with the results clinical trials. Moreover, previous treatment with anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab might have affected the effectiveness of ustekinumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信